Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes

“Stubborness does have its helpful features. You always know what you are going to be thinking tomorrow.” ~ Glen Beaman



Hi there!

 

Thanks for stopping by Patricia’s Opinion Dot Com.  Due to time constraints and other considerations, there have been a few necessary changes around here. Beginning August 1, 2011, I’ll no longer be posting at this site. But if you’d like, you can find my articles, essays, podcast interviews and “Expert in Failed Relationships Advice Column at:


HS Radio e-magazine: www.harlotssauce.com

 

For press releases, press photos, events, workshops and other appearances, please have a visit over to my personal author website at:

 

http://www.patriciaVdavis.com

 

To request my consultation, interview, or speaking fees, please contact my author liaison, Jane Hunter at:

jh@johngalvisagency.com

 

And if you just want to say hello, please send me an email:

patricia@patriciaVdavis.com


or visit my Facebook page:

http://www.facebook.com/patriciaVdavis


or find me on Twitter:

@patriciaVdavis


or Google +1

..or heaven knows what else by the time you read this!

 

Thank you for your interest in my writing.  I look forward to hearing from you!

 


Arts Critic Jan Wahl from KRON 4 News with Patricia V. Davis at "Diva Doctrine" Launch

 

How to Have a Successful and Rewarding (Writing) Life

Oscar Wilde, 1882

So a number of people have written to ask me for tips for a successful writing life. (Yes, believe it or not, they have. Why they’re asking me and not JK Rowling is a puzzle, but there you go.) In response, I thought I’d post my rules for doing that here. In fact, on pretty much every point, the points below are most likely the way I’d lead my life even if I hadn’t chosen to be a writer:

1)    Work hard.


2)    Have a supportive spouse/partner and family. If he/she is not supportive consider that this person may not be the person for you. (I’m serious.)  If your family (parents and other relatives) are not supportive, ignore them completely. If your children are not supportive, unless they’re under age 18, ignore them, too. Don’t let other people’s discontent with their own lives taint your perspective, even if you happen to love those people. You giving up your dreams will not make them any happier.


3)    Work even harder.


4)    Remember every single person who helps you get a step up ─ the people who give you blurbs, the people who leave comments on your blog, the people who review your book, your agent, your fellow writers who show up at your book events, the book seller who hosts your events, the local newspaper columnist who does a story on you, the editors who critique your work (they’re your friends not your enemies) ─ and even if that person never does another thing for you, try to help them at least twice as much as they helped you whenever you can.


5)    Keep working hard.


6)    Take no notice of anyone who is jealous of you and/or seems to wish you harm. Don’t be offended by those who trash your work, who say “no” to any requests, who ask to be taken off your mailing list, who give you an *unrealistically negative review. If you expend energy worrying about these people, that is that much of your energy used up in a negative way and ─ believe me ─ you will need all your energy. (See points 1, 3, 5, 7, 9.) Also, don’t be jealous of other people’s success. Don’t compare yourself to others, ever. Because what you’re comparing are two very unalike things; what you’re comparing is your inside to what somebody else’s outside appears to look like to you. Again, a big fat waste of energy.


7)    Keep working. Now is not the time to get discouraged.


8)    In point six, I say ignore the “unrealistically” negative review. But if someone takes the time to critique your work and make a criticism or two that you keep hearing over and over again, it’s time to silently thank those detractors and look over your work with a more critical eye. They took time out of their busy lives to write about your book. Heck, they even spent money to buy your book, and if they’re telling you something, perhaps you ought to mull over. This is a positive, not a negative thing.


9)    The more successful you get, the harder you work. Yes, that part sucks, but that’s the way it is. If you have one book out, you should be marketing it, but at the same time, you should be at least thinking about your next writing project. Can you say, “10-hours-a-day workday, 6 days a week?” Better be able to do more than say it.


10)    On point #9, if you want to have a life outside of writing and still be successful at it, plan every moment of your day to get the most out of your time. 10 hours a day includes your marketing time as well as your writing time. The rest of the day includes your sleep, your dinner time, exercise, your hobbies, your chores, your time with your family and friends. So plan it out well. Savor it. Don’t waste it.


11)    Embrace your workday, don’t resent it. You will be extremely unhappy if you can’t do this one thing.


12)    Take time off when you need to and do not feel guilty about it, ever
. Want to spend time with your young children, even several years of time? Do it. Want to go away with your partner or some friends? With few exceptions, don’t make it a working holiday. (Unless, of course, you’re in the middle of book tour. Ahem.) Embrace your time off as much as you embrace your work day. Because the definition of “success” is being able to look back on your life without too many regrets.

Anyone care to add their own ideas on the above? I’d love to hear them.

:-D

(P.S. Isn’t this a wonderful photo of Oscar?)

What’s So Great About Being A Kid?

You know those emails that start with “Remember When…?” I don’t like those emails at all. Not only are they B-movie, nostalgia-in-a-can ─ “Milk delivered right to your door by the milkman!”, “Coca-cola in a glass bottle!” ─ they’re out and out dishonest, albeit in a ingratiatingly syrupy way.  They mean to have us remember a reality that didn’t exist, that US life in the 50’s and 60’s was much better than it is today. From my perspective, that’s just not true. Yeah, the air was cleaner then, portions were smaller then and people were leaner then. Blah blah blah.

But am I the only one who remembers this:


Or, this:


Besides the racist and sexist actualities which permeated the 60’s and 70’s, my own reality was that it was just not as much fun to be a kid as it’s cracked up to be. Looking back I see that most people my parents’ age were more naïve than they should have been about many things. The world wasn’t any safer, our parents just perceived it to be.  Regardless of their level of education, they were also a lot more provincial than even the least educated American today. And as a whole, that generation certainly seemed to be a lot less educated on how to parent. Below is my list of all the stuff I hated about being a kid, and I know I couldn’t have been the only one who had experiences like these:


1. Being forced to eat ALL that was served to me of my mother’s soggy macaroni and broccoli (a dish that had no cheese, no seasoning at all, was over-boiled and dripping with corn oil) while under threat of the wooden spoon she kept next to her plate.



2. Having to go to bed earlier than all my friends, who got to watch all the fun shows. They’d talk about them the next day at school, and all I could do was listen and seethe.


3. Getting punished on the weekend and not being allowed to see my one favorite show that was on before my bedtime, which was ─ yippee ─ a whole hour later than on weeknights.


4. Having to watch younger sibs. Having them hate me for that. Having to referee their arguments. Having them report to our parents what a lousy job of referring I did. Getting punished for doing a lousy job. (Wooden spoon again and, just for good measure, see number three.)


5. Having to come in the house in the summertime before it got dark.


6. Being forced to sit out in the backyard in the summertime for “a nice outdoor meal”, while caterpillars from the overhanging oak tree branches dropped onto the table, sometimes into my plate, and crawled under the bench where we sat, onto the backs of my thighs. And I was wearing shorts.


7. Not getting to pick out my own clothes. (See “wearing shorts.”)


8. Having someone else brush my hair. (Ouch!)



Now let’s move on to the teen years:


9. Being too fat to get picked for sports.  (I guess fat is what happens when you’re forced to eat a half a pound of limp macaroni that’s been floating in oil.)


10. Being too fat to get invited to the prom, which was maybe for the best, because…


11. Not being allowed to go to the prom. Or to babysit. Or to attend sleepovers. Or go on school trips.


12. Having to wear those big ol’ round coke bottle glasses they made back in the day, until I was eighteen and old enough to buy a pair of contact lenses on my own.



And finally at Lucky 13─


13.    Meeting my first husband at age 19, and getting married looong before I should.


Need I go on?


So when people my age talk about how much better things were when they were young, I think, “Seriously?”  That just wasn’t my experience.


Sure, there are plenty of things I miss about being a little girl, but now that I’m old enough to eat what I want to eat, watch what I want to watch, and go to bed when I say I’m tired, now that the only things I have to live with are the decisions I make for myself, I, for one, am enjoying my life much more today than I did then.

That’s why for me these days are “the good old days.” Because I’m old, but I’m feelin’ good.

What about you?

Breaking Up is Hard to Do — Especially if You’re a Schmuck

As the TV ad says, "These things always tell the truth"

Those who read my blog regularly know that when it comes to love and Valentine’s Day, I can usually be pretty sappy. Like in this post here. But this Valentine’s Day, I decided to play devil’s advocate and ask people to please contribute  the worst break up or parting line they’ve ever had to hear from a lover. Those of you who read my first book already know what mine was. (“Have you got time to do one more load of laundry before you leave?”)  But the ones below top even that. If you’re feeling blue or lonely today, these lines will remind that there are far worse things than being alone on Valentine’s Day. Read ‘em, weep, and feel free to add your own:

___________________________________

Sharon: After becoming a platinum blonde in the 70′s….”Wow ─  you look gorgeous…I told you you’d look good as a blonde.  I want a divorce.”

Jessica: “I was thinking maybe you could be the stepmom.” (I’ll let you guess the situation that led him to say that!)

Jeanne: It was Valentine’s Day, and I drove out to Cornell to surprise my boyfriend. I got the surprise. I saw him walking down the street holding another girl’s hand. He saw me, said something to her, and she kept walking. He then crossed the street to me. When I asked him what was going on, he said, “Life’s a bitch” and walked away.

Eat My Heart Out

Mark: “Don’t worry about your money…I’ve already emptied all the accounts.”


Brenda: ‎”I could never marry YOU … do you know how big your daughter would be??” (Ha! Joke’s on him … had no daughters and my only son is 6’7″!)


Mike: I have two. “It’s not you, it’s me.” (Which it was.)  And,  “I’ll give you a call soon.”


Tiana:  ‎“I’ve been bad. I’ve been seeing Peggy.” (Oh, and he eventually married her, too. …On Valentine’s Day.)

Take another little piece, now, BAY-BEE

Karen: Not the final line, but the one that lead to the inevitable ending: when asked why he was being so mean to me after my mom had just died, my charmer’s response was,“She didn’t *just* die. It’s been nine days.”


Leigh Anne: He worked at a local ski shop. Picks me up on his motorcycle to spend the day riding up Independence Pass. Without hardly a hello plunges ahead with, “I just helped Stevie Nicks buy her ski boots. I think I’m in love…” Proceeds to rave on about her for the next 2 hours… Gahh! I was trapped. When we FINally got back to my place, it was all I could do not to dive off the bike and run screaming for the house! (Ok, so a bit more than a one liner.)


Alexander: All I can remember really is that two or three times they ended with, “But I was hoping we can still be friends”. I hate that line. Seriously, you tear out my heart and expect me to like you for it? If that line ended with “friends with benefits”, I would be very torn. I think I would have an aneurysm after five minutes of standing there thinking very, very hard.

I Have Your Heart. (Feel the pressure on your chest yet?)

Persia: Unfortunately I heard this same line twice ─ “She isn’t half the woman you are, but I love her.”


Dora:  ‎“You don’t deserve me, you deserve better.”


Christos: Okay, here goes— (And this beats George Costanza’s ‘It’s not you, it’s me’ line):

She: I met someone else. You guys are so alike. He has 95% of the great qualities that you have!”
Me:
But I have 100% of the great qualities that I have!!!
She:
Yeah, but…ummm…well, whatever. See ya!


Jerry:

She: I’m pregnant!
Me: OMG! Really!?!
She: It’s not yours…



You've really caught me in your love trap

Carina: “I’m in love with two women at the same time…” (Gag)

Teresa: ‎”Sorry I didn’t call, but I met up with my ex-girlfriend and we had an erotic experience.”  (True story.)


George: …Break up line?   ;-)



And you…?

How to Get Your Grown Children to Visit at the Holidays (A Satire)

You’ve dug out the ceramic platter you bought 40 years ago─ the one with the smiling turkey painted on it. You’ve polished the brass menorah, or fluffed the plastic branches of your pre-lighted Christmas tree. But, where are the kids? Once again, your grown children have nothing but excuses to give you for the holidays. Not to worry ─ the instructions below will get your babies back to the bosom of their origins for the annual festivities. All you have to do is modify the steps according to the number of children you have:

1. Stake Your Claim: Loudly inform every child, grandchild, in-law, and sibling at this year’s gathering, “It’s my turn next year.” Have everyone at the table sign an affidavit that they’ve heard and acknowledged this. Then when next year comes, if they renege, that signed paper should hold up in court.

2. Invite Your Single Son First: He’s an easy mark. A bachelor son is always willing to partake of  a meal he didn’t have to cook for himself, even if for him, Thanksgiving won’t actually be ‘Thanksgiving’, but his 25h Annual, ‘How-Come-You-Never-Got-Married-Are-You-Sure-You’re-Not-Gay’ Day.

3. Strike the Youngest Second: By ‘strike’ I mean, ‘wheedle’ ‘cajole’ and ‘plead’. One of these attempts will get a weary “yes” out the youngest, because they’re the most likely to still be suffering from unresolved mother issues. So, go ahead ─ tug on the remnants of that umbilical cord. Just be sure to give the youngest cash for his or her holiday gift. Therapy is expensive.

4. Hit the Married Daughter Next: Your married daughter wants to spend the holidays with her overbearing mother-in-law even less than she wants to spend them with you. Veiled criticisms of her weight gain and her mothering style which she has to swallow along with her green bean casserole don’t upset her stomach quite as much if they come from a more time-honored source. So, if she’s got school age children and a full time job, there’s a good chance you can lure her in with, “Come on─ with all the extra work you have to do for the holidays, do you really want to cook?”

5. Now You’re Ready to Attack the Married Son: The married son is the toughest ‘catch’ because that woman he married insists on spending the holiday with ‘her side’. You need to tell your son exactly this when you phone. Don’t think of this conversation as an invitation, but more as a demand for an audience.  Remind him of precisely how many times he’s gone to his wife’s family instead of his own; that all his siblings will be at your house except for him ─ again ─ and that the last time you had holiday dinner with him was when you were still coloring your hair. It’s unlikely he’ll agree to come, but he will tell his wife, and at least then she’ll know exactly how you feel.

6. Bask in the Spoils of War: This is an achievement of which you can be proud ─ most, if not all of your offspring are sitting around your holiday table, doing their yearly penance over dried out turkey, store-bought gravy, and canned cranberry sauce.

And after all, isn’t that what the holidays are all about?

Note: Dear Friends —This blog site is under construction. We are planning a blog roll and a number of other things to be added to it. One of the reasons I haven’t updated in a long while. Happy Holidays to all!

A Boy, a Girl, and a Fountain

The spring I turned twenty-two, I was desperately trying to

recover from a ravaging love affair that had changed me from a

girl who was somewhat confident for her age and mostly happy,

to one who was completely demoralized. It was not only the

relationship itself, but the reactions to the demise of the

relationship by friends and family who I thought I knew that

made me lose all trust in my perceptions of people.

And so, I stopped caring about anything at all. I was walking,

eating, breathing, but I wasn’t really living. On I went like that

for a while, truly believing that was how I was going to exist

for the rest of my days. Until that one day, when I opened my

dresser drawer and noticed the engagement ring I’d taken off

blinking out at me. I looked at it for a moment, then picked it up,

put in it my handbag, left the house, took the subway to

Manhattan’s Seventh Avenue Diamond Exchange, and sold that

ring to a jeweler for two thousand dollars. Then I promptly

spent the entire two grand to buy a tour of continental Europe,

the “If-it’s-Tuesday-this-must-be Belgium” kind.

My first holiday abroad, and I was going alone.

It was in Rome, the third city on the tour, that it happened, just

as we’ve all seen it happen in the vintage black and white films

starring Audrey Hepburn. I was already recovering myself,

brave enough to book the trip, brave enough to travel by myself,

braver still to venture out of my hotel room sans tour guide and

group to see the sights. I’d only walked a block when a young

man drove by in a convertible and looked over at me. He had

everything ─ the good looks, the fancy car, and the sense of

romantic adventure that sanctioned his cutting off a taxi and

driving up onto the sidewalk next to me with the finesse and

casualness I now know is an inherent trait passed down only to

Italian motorists. But as this was my first visit to Italy, I watched

dumbfounded as he got out of his car, leaving the door wide

open, and strode over. Then he just stood in front of me and

stared.

After a few moments of that, he said, “Signorina, my name is

‘Paolo.’ You are so beautiful. Will you please, please, please

go out with me tonight?”

I should have said no. That would have been wisest, but he was

looking at me with such enchantment and hope that I heard

myself agree to spend an evening in an unfamiliar city with a

stranger who, depending on how you viewed it, was either a

very bad or a very good driver.

When he picked me up at my hotel later as promised, he’d

brought his car, and sitting in it was another young man who

introduced himself as “Giorgio, Paolo’s friend”. Apparently,

Paolo, who didn’t speak English, had noticed my poor Italian

and recognized that there would be a language impediment. So

he’d brought along a translator. Giorgio did speak English very

well, and seemed quite happy to serve as liaison for his friend

and his friend’s foreign date.

It never occurred to me for one moment that I was at risk.

Despite my recent disillusionments, I was still ridiculously

naïve, and they seemed like perfectly nice young men with

nothing more on their minds than spending an evening with a girl

who, for some reason I couldn’t fathom, they both found

intriguing.

Here’s the point: I was exactly correct. After we left the hotel,

the first thing we did was zig zag through narrow, stone-paved

streets to get to an out-of the way trattoria where we shared a

pizza that tasted as though it has been made for the gods. After

which, they took me to the Tivoli Gardens, where Paolo

bubbled explanations for what we were seeing, and Giorgio

translated whatever I couldn’t catch. Our last stop for the

evening was the Fontana di Trevi, the famous fountain in which

one throws a coin in wish and promise to return to Rome.

Typically tourist, I held up my camera and asked if I could take

a photo of them in front of it, but Giorgio insisted that the photo

be of Paolo and me. Just as the flash went off, Paolo leaned

over and kissed me, just one simple, boyish kiss on my cheek,

caught in that photo, for me to remember forever.

“So, nothing happened?” is what I was asked dubiously by my

seat mates the next morning, as our coach sped off to Venice,

the next city on our route.

‘Yes, something happened,’ is what I wanted to say, ‘my faith in

human nature and in men has been restored.’ All in one evening,

and at the glorious fountain I will always believe is as magic as

it’s purported to be.

I recount this factual but somewhat sappy ‘woman’s magazine

story’ if you will, for one reason only, and that reason is: Joran

van der Sloot

Joran van der Sloot, with the gleeful assistance of every major

newspaper and television station has horrified young women

and their mothers into believing that every stranger ─ indeed,

every foreigner ─ who has a penis can and will use it as a

weapon against females. As the mother of five sons, and as the

(formerly) young girl whose disillusioned spirit was cared for

so tenderly that time in Rome so long ago, I resent that

depiction so much I want to spit.

Just once, I’d like to see Larry King or Nancy Grace interview a

‘Paolo’ and ask him about his dealings with women, like this,

“Tell us, Paolo ─ you had a vulnerable girl who stupidly put

herself at your mercy ─ why didn’t you take advantage of that by

drugging her, raping her, beating her to death, and then throwing

her in the Tiber? No one would have known – you could have

gotten away with it – so why didn’t you do it? Why don’t you

share the foreign man’s purported image of American women as

‘sluts’? What were the ideals and morals you were raised with

by your parents that have made you like and respect females so

much? Tell us. And most significantly, tell us about your

relationship with your mother. She must be quite an

extraordinary woman.”

The mother. Yes. The mother in this sordid tale who’s being

most blogged about, most talked about, is Beth Holloway ─ in

vague, but insinuating enough terms that she was feckless in

allowing her daughter Natalee to go on a high school graduation

trip to Aruba.

Parents of teens, please help me out here ─ can you not just

picture how that conversation went?

Beth: Jug, honey, do you think we should let Natalee go on that

trip?

Twitty: Yes. No. I don’t know. Whatever you think, hon.

Beth: She’s such a good girl, graduated with honors, member of

the National Honor Society, and now going to attend the

University of Alabama on a full scholarship. I hate to be the

only parent to say ‘no.’ She’d never forgive me.

And she’d be right about that, wouldn’t she, parents who have

teens and young adult children? Our sons are all in their early to

late 20’s by now, yet they still gripe about stuff we didn’t allow

them to do in high school that other kids got to do. And you

know what? – They’ll keep right on griping…until they have

kids of their own.

So Beth Holloway bet on the very good odds that Natalee would

run into a Paolo and Giorgio instead of a Joran, Deepak, and

Satish. She lost that bet. And being blonde, white, rich,

attractive, intelligent, and ramrod persistent, television,

magazines, radio stations and newspapers will make her pay

for losing by subtly painting her as unsympathetically as

possible ─ her divorce from Natalee’s father, her plastic

surgeries, her rumored affair with John Ramsey ─ because,

let’s face it, television, magazines, radio stations and

newspapers only like to ‘buddy up’ to blondes when said

blondes are Anna Nicole Smith, or on the other end of that

spectrum, Ann Coulter.

Yet from my perspective, the mom who seems to have gotten a

‘free pass’ from the media regarding even a consideration of

maternal incompetence is Anita van der Sloot, who insisted in

an email to her son’s ex-girlfriend that he “was being set up.”

Then again, also from my perspective, the only way she could

not be deemed incompetent at this point is if she took a gun and

shot the creature that sprang from her womb. And while she’s at

it, I’d love to see her blow away every single sensationalist

news outlet that has paid and keeps paying her monster of a son

for interviews; interviews in which he lies over and over again,

interviews that have been so lucrative for him that he has lived

off of them for the past five years since Natalee Holloway’s

murder, enough to go gambling in Peru where he was able to

murder yet again.

I am sickened by all of this, but most of all I am sickened by a

media that we have allowed to morph into our ‘dysfunctional

parent’ ─ a xenophobic, ethnocentric, small-minded parent with

a self-serving agenda, to whom we have given our full consent

to emotionally blackmail us into believing that all foreigners

are terrorists, all American women are despised by said

foreigners and therefore in danger whenever they travel abroad,

(so best to stay home, provincial and pregnant); psychopaths

‘deserve’ to be heard, and a bright, promising 18-year-old girl,

with the assistance of a mother who loves her, somehow

colluded in her own brutalization by accepting a date with a

handsome stranger.

Please note: The glitches on this page are worse than ever. I’m really sorry I have so much trouble posting here. If you would like to say hello, or respond to this post, it also appears in Harlots Sauce Radio June Issue and at my WordPress blog

Send to a friend

Why Do You Have So Many Kids?

Uber-Liberals can be just as off-putting as uber-Conservatives. I’m not talking about the type of Liberals who look at you with disappointment as you discreetly try to eat your cheeseburger, while they’ve ordered the veggie platter. I’m talking about the kind of uber-Liberals who, after you’ve invited them to dinner, respecting their beliefs enough to serve them up ‘Tofu Surprise,’ they still look at you as though you’ve handed them nuclear waste to consume because you heated their food in a ─ gasp! ─ ‘energy-bleeding, cancer-causing’ microwave.
I’m talking about the kind of Liberal who wanted to hang Michael Vick publicly by his…well, rhymes with ‘Vick’, and cut out his bowels, because of his mistreatment of dogs, but yet picketed San Quentin State Prison in order to save Stanley ‘Tookie’ Williams from execution. Not because they were at San Quentin protesting every execution of every inmate on death row, opposing the death penalty in general. That I can respect. However, Clarence Allen’s execution went virtually unnoticed in comparison to Stanley’s, because Stanley, who was the co-founder of The Crips ─ a Los

Angeles street gang that still exists today ─ had written some children’s books while he was incarcerated, books against street gang violence. Oh, and he also apologized for his brutal murder of a family of Chinese immigrants who were running a motel that Stanley robbed, and additionally for the shots at point blank range he put into the back of a 26-year old convenience store clerk during another robbery.


Yeah, you see, even though Stan refused to aid police investigations with any information against his gang, and was implicated in attacks on guards and other inmates, as well as in multiple escape plots, he and his supporters still maintained he’d had a change of heart, albeit too late for the people he slaughtered. Nonetheless, a battalion of lawyers was utilized, and piles of state tax money were spent on stay after stay of execution for Tookie. Tookie’s death sentence was protested because he was a celebrity in his own right. But Clarence Allen, a 76-year-old heart patient and diabetic when he was executed at the same prison, went pretty much unnoticed by the press and any uber-Liberals.
So, this is the sort of Liberal I’m talking about.

In fact, I’m pretty sure my husband and I came across a husband and wife team of this precise type of person the other night. And the husband part of the set, with the wife nodding along her agreement, asked us this in exactly these words:


“How come you have so many kids? Doesn’t it bother you the impact they have on the environment, and the adding to the problem of overpopulation?”

Now, my husband, bless his heart, took that as a genuine question, and not as the two-part accusation framed as a question that it actually was. That’s why he proceeded to answer it genuinely,too, explaining at length how much we love kids, etc. Heck, he practically whipped out his bank book to assure this fellow that, not to worry, we can indeed afford these offspring. In fact, we pay handsomely, to the tune of forty-percent of our hard-earned income in taxes, to offset any harmful consequence our children have had on our planet, based solely on their existence.

But, while he was doing that, I was looking at this couple who were looking at my husband while he was explaining himself, thinking, “Would you have posed that pseudo-question to us if we were covered in black skin instead of white?”


Probably not, would be the answer, because that would be an uber-Liberal “no-no” for so many reasons. But it’s okay to say it to us, because not only are we white, my husband is really, really white. My background is Italian, but my husband has roots that go back as far as the next boat after The Mayflower. And, between us we had five children, all sons.


Yow ─ five white males. Not good. It almost sounds like we’ve birthed a clan of neo-Nazis, doesn’t it? But we are a blended family, so only four of our sons are just as WASP-y as their father, while my one biological offspring ‘sprang’ from the loins of a Greek
.
Now that I’m thinking about it, that particular son doesn’t even look all that white. He’s got very dark eyes and his hair, in long dredlocks now, is also dark. In addition, as far as his politics go, in the few short years he’s been old enough to vote, I’m fairly certain he’s voted Democrat every time. He’s also a musician and film major at university, two other aspects about him I’d imagine uber-Liberals would embrace.

So, do we get a ‘pass’ on him? I think we should, from a Liberal’s standpoint, anyway. The other four are likely more problematic, though, given their background and occupations.


Let’s start with the twins.
One of them is a long-haul trucker, trekking people’s furnishings back and forth across the U.S. as they are forced to move because banks are repossessing their homes.


Ick, a long-haul trailer truck ─ that’s a huge carbon footprint. That son might have to go.


On the other hand, if there were no long-haul trucks, there’d be no way for people to move their possessions which are made from various materials, including, probably, plastics. What would happen if we forced everyone to abandon their possessions along with their homes? They’d have to get new stuff wherever they moved. That would cause twice as many non-recyclables per repossessed family to be present on the planet, causing that much more pollution.


Therefore, on second thought, that son is probably a necessary evil. So, I think we should get to keep him, too.

(Sigh) I wish I could come up with a reason to keep the second twin, but unfortunately, I can’t. The second twin builds houses for a living, and that occupation is naively optimistic, given that the housing market has gone to hell in a hand basket, and is not going to get better any time soon. So really, he’s just wasting trees. Also, even though he bought my husband and me both Al Franken and Barack Obama books for Christmas, I know he’s voted Republican now and again. And, I must confess, he owns guns. You can see there’s just no good reason he should be on the planet, despite the fact that he’s really rather sweet, has never been out of work, pays all his taxes, and even has a very liberal Poli-Sci degree.We’d be sorry to see him go, but he was part of a two-for-one, so I suppose it’s okay, as no one had really planned on him originally, anyway.
Oh wait ─ I know! ─ we can offer him up as an exchange. We lost his younger brother in a car accident several years back. Now that son wasn’t even 19 when he left us. He didn’t have much of chance to “add to overpopulation,” and unless you count playing some really badass baseball as having a “negative impact on the environment,” he didn’t get a chance to do much damage in that way, either.

So, the way I see it, is we have four surviving sons, who came originally from two sets of parents. That’s four for four, so doesn’t that make us even?

I also think there’s no way anyone would want us to get rid of the only one I haven’t mentioned, because he’s an accountant. With trillions of dollars in federal debt, trillions more being spent on Iraq and Afghanistan, and trillions additionally that the banks loaned out so capriciously, and which we are now having to give back to said banks with even more of our tax dollars, the country needs as many accountants as it can get to keep track of all that money as it slips through all our fingers.


You know, after careful consideration of all the combined factors, I think people should lay off us and our sons. So, the next time someone asks us how come we have so many kids, I know exactly what I’m going to say:

“My husband used to sell birth control pills. These boys are customer complaints.”

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Declaring Myself

As I roam around various blogs, I notice that though I don’t know many of my blogging friends’ real first and last names, I do know that they are “Christian” or “Atheist,” “Conservative” or “Liberal.”

It seems important to many that others know what bunch they’re part of, and certainly that they are part of a bunch—any bunch. It’s also important to many to know which bunch others are a part of, because in this way they can gauge that other person based on whatever that other person’s particular bunch signifies to them.

For example, if someone states, “Hi, my name is Such-and-Such, and I’m a Christian,” or, “Hi, my name is So-and-So, and I’m a Liberal,” there’s bound to be someone hearing either of those introductions thinking, “Uh Oh,” or, “Thank goodness.” So, without knowing anything else about this new person, we experience either a warm mental welcome towards that person, or an uncomfortable wariness.

Declaring oneself part of faction serves two other purposes for some, too: It allows them to cheer for their particular faction, just like we do with sports teams. Most of us, when we have a favourite sports team, don’t really care much about what that team does to win. As long as it does. After all, that’s the one purpose of team sports these days, isn’t it? To win… regardless of how that’s achieved?

Choosing to be part of a group also means to some that they can let their group do their thinking for them. Let’s face it ─ mulling over our country’s foreign policies, or which candidate we should vote for, or where we stand on each individual issue is hard work. To start, we have to find the hour in our already busy days to read about what those issues are, and from more than one source in order to get a balanced view. Then, we have to analyse all that information and decide what we believe regarding every issue on a one-by-one basis. But, most of us have to work eight hours a day, at least, then come home and take care of chores, houses, kids, maybe even a pet. Much easier to let our group simply tell us what we think. That saves us a lot of trouble, doesn’t it? At least in the short term, it does.

So, in the interest of fair play, because though anyone who reads my blog knows my name, my occupation and even where I live, they don’t know my affiliations, because I’ve never openly declared them. Now I will:

I am a follower of Patrichism, which makes me a Patrichist. Below, I’ll list the basic principles by which Patrichists live:

1. Patrichists strive to be pro-active, not re-active. Meaning, we don’t take action based solely on our emotions, we try to think rather than just feel. Let’s say that something ‘feels’ wrong to us, like, for example, abortion or gun control. I pick these two issues because Liberals are ‘for’ both, and Conservatives are ‘against’ both. But not all Patrichists have an identical opinion on either. What all Patrichists do agree upon, however, is how we deal with our feelings on these two issues. The first thing we do not do is re-act in a knee-jerk way, by issuing hysterical demands to deem them both unequivocally unlawful.
Instead, a Patrichist will think – what might happen if all abortions or all gun control were to be outlawed? What good could happen as a result? What bad could happen? What might the long term effects be? How would those effects spill over into other areas we might not expect or anticipate? Patrichists think the same way with, say, offshore drilling. Or declaring war on another country. Whatever the issue, a Patrichist acknowledges his/her gut feelings, but does not act upon those feelings, by immediately banding with a group that supports or opposes. A true Patrichist thinks everything through thoroughly before holding an opinion. A true Patrichist entertains all perspectives on every issue in his/her mind, openly and without fear of where his thoughts might take him.

Aristotle said, “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a concept without necessarily accepting it.” Patrichists keep their minds educated by using them and holding their emotions at bay, until such time as their thoughts can be formed coherently.

2. A Patrichist never worries about what others will think if the stance they hold on any particular issue is different than theirs. She doesn’t worry about being ostracized, even from her own group. A Patrichist is unafraid to stand alone.

3. Patrichists are also not afraid to change their minds on an issue if new information comes to light. This does not make them ‘wishy-washy,’ this makes them intelligent. Since Patrichists believe that opinions should be formed based on knowledge and not emotions, it stands to reason that the more knowledge one gains of an issue, the more complex that issue becomes, and the more one needs to think it through, possibly causing a change in perspective. In simpler terms, Patrichists are not blinded to one idea and one perspective only, but are always open to new ones. This is what makes them so powerful. Politicians cannot manipulate Patrichists, because politicians can never get a consensus on what a Patrichist may or may not be thinking about any one issue. Since Patrichists’ thoughts are individually and not grouped-based, that means that the only way any politician has a chance of getting the vote of some Patrichists, (though not necessarily all), is to tell them what he really thinks. Which no politician will ever do, of course, for fear of losing the surer votes of Liberals or Conservatives, or whoever he’s after who can be counted on to have a more predictable mindset.


4. Patrichists use the word ‘faith’ carefully. They never say they have “faith” in a politician, as though that politician is God. Yet, a Patrichist can have faith in their God, if they choose to believe in one. That’s right—some Patrichists believe in God, others don’t; but whether they do or don’t, they recognize that blind ‘faith’ in a politician is the way to loss of free thought and will, but faith in a God is an acceptable choice, as long as it harms no one. No matter what any religious person or any atheist will tell you, there is no clear-cut proof that any god exists or does not exist, there is only each individual’s idea of such. And because religion is an idea, a Patrichist respects every human being’s right to a different one. Even so, all Patrichists recognize that there exists good and evil, and that any killing done in the name of any idea of any religion is evil, pure and simple.
5. Lastly, one of a Patrichist’s main motivations in life is to leave every place she or he enters a little bit better than it was before. But, Patrichists’ thoughts are global when they think in terms of ‘place.’ A Patrichist counts the entire planet, not just one particular state or country, as the place to strive to make a positive difference.


So, that’s the entirety of Patrichism. Five very good points. I try my damndest to practice these every day. In fact, I’ve practiced Patrichism for so long, that I’ve earned a PhD. in it. “Dr. Davis”, that’s me.

Of course, my doctorate is self-proclaimed. How? Because ‘Patrichism’ is my very own ‘ism’ that I made up myself, my personal ‘ism’ by which I try my best to live. This should explain the match of the first six letters of this particular ‘ism’ to those in my first name.

Up until now, I’ve been the only member of my “Society of Patrichists.” But today, I’ve decided to begin awarding ‘honourary degrees in Patrichism’ to those who, by reading their blogs, I’ve come to believe follow (or, like me, try their best to follow) the principles of Patrichism.

Those who receive an honourary degree are under no obligation to accept it, of course. In fact, they can even refute it for any reason at all, and no hard feelings. But for those listed below who feel they have earned a degree in Patrichism and would like to accept it, I’ll happily send you your diploma via email, signed, sealed, and flourished for you to place on your office wall, with my very best wishes:

 

Honourary Bachelor’s Degree in Patrichism Awarded To (Alphabetically):

iliask.vox.com

lightchaser.vox.com

schoonerhelm.vox.com

shushnow.vox.com

All of these ‘Under Thirties’ above have the wonderful ability to think outside the box or group of circumstances they happen to be born into. They are all, in their own way striving to do something special with their lives. I highly recommend their blogs. They have wisdom beyond their years and always teach me something or make me think.


Honourary Master’s Degree of Patrichism Awarded To (Alphabetically):

headwaves.vox.com/

paxblog.vox.com

With all the madness going on in politics these days, reading these two, knowing they’re out there, thinking and caring, makes me sleep better at night.

Honourary Doctrate Degree in Patrichism:

petermcc.vox.com

You know, there just has to be another Dr. of Patrichism out there, and this one feels especially right because he discusses so many issues and he’s (I hope he won’t mind my telling ) even older than I, thus earning ‘experience’ points. I could have picked snowy938.vox.com, too of course, but last I heard he’d already had a reader declare him a ‘Snowy God.’ And being a god beats earning an honourary doctorate any day.

More honourary degree listings coming in future months. And for anyone on this list who wants to accept his/her diploma, on my honour as a Patrichist, I promise I will send you one. To those who accept, I guess I can say, ironically, “Welcome to the bunch!”

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Anahata

Sleepy Hollow, Northern California. “What a perfect place for a writer to live,” I thought, when I moved here almost five years ago. And I did get a lot of writing done, when I wasn’t in my garden, that is.

Our house is surrounded by woods and high hills, with a seasonal creek dancing along the right edge of our property, lined by a sentinel of three giant rocks. “We’re butt up against nature here,” is what my husband likes to say.

When I saw it, apart from thinking about the quaint name of the area and of its street names, like “Van Winkle Drive,” and “Ichabod Lane,” I also imagined that I could, at long last, have a garden. Having lived all my life in small flats in a city or by the sea, I’d made do with potted flowers on my windowsills and balconies. Now I had almost a full acre of dirt to plant and I couldn’t wait to get started.

Testing the soil, mapping the sunny and shady areas of the ground, I bought containers and containers of colourful blooms and planted them with enthusiasm and care. I toiled in that garden daily, my nails turning jagged and brown as I dug in eggshells and coffee grinds to fertilize the earth, picked off caterpillars and crinkled dead stems from each plant, watered and weeded carefully and methodically. Week after week, month after month I worked, until my garden was rich and full and I could revel in the vibrancy of it.

Then the deer came. Dozens of them, grown and small, with antlers and without; they came down from the rise of trees behind our house. To someone who’d never seen them up close before, they looked splendid, graceful and gentle. A gift from nature, a blessing, even.

Until I woke up one morning and wandered out into my garden to discover it no longer existed. I could see only the remnants of it left by a savage marauder who thought every blossom, every leaf I’d lovingly attended, was nothing more than dinner salad. The deer had eaten their way through bougainvillea, geraniums, lobelia, impatiens, petunias, pansies, azalea bushes, rose bushes, and when nothing else was left, even ivy vines. I stood in horrified dismay looking down at the concrete and the grass where scattered specks of green, blue, red, pink, purple, and yellow, which had once been my beloved, beautiful flowers, lay strewn and still, as though they’d tried to run and escape from a terrible siege, but had perished in their efforts, anyway.

The deer became my enemy then, and my war with them was on. Armed with powdered blood meal, deer netting, and a foul smelling spray made of garlic and eggs, I attacked. They retreated for a while. Then I woke up one morning again to discover that during the night, the hungry deer had somehow managed to nibbled under the netting. They’d also concluded that both powdered blood meal and rotten egg/garlic spray made delightful salad dressings. My flowers were murdered a second time. Not only did this make me cry, it made me furious.

My husband could not understand my perspective. Growing up on a farm and living in rural areas all his life, he’d shared space with various wild animals since he’d been born. To him, the presence of deer in our garden had the same feeling about it you get when you shrug on an old coat. It wasn’t necessarily attractive, but it felt familiar and comfortable. But in just the way I splashed delightedly into the sea in Greece while he stood there shivering and thinking of sharks; or slid easily between passengers on a New York City subway while he thought of pickpockets, the deer were as alien to me as those experiences were to him. Somehow, he’d missed that.

“Why not just plant things they won’t eat?” he asked pragmatically, not even trying to hide his impatience with me.

“What, you mean lavender?” I replied, sardonically, not even trying to hide my annoyance with him.

To me, just having purple buds in the garden looked dull. Judging by the preponderance of lavender and oleander in the area, everyone else had surrendered to the deer. But I wouldn’t. I didn’t even like oleander, although the fact that it was poisonous and that the deer just might get hungry enough to eat it, was an entertaining thought by that time.

My focus on the deer and their activities in our garden became a bone of contention between my husband and me. Now I’d graduated to running outdoors whenever I saw one, to clap my hands at it and “shoo” it away, spraying them with the hose when I was out watering in my garden, hovering by the windows whenever I heard any suspicious rustling outside, and even throwing small pebbles at their feet so they’d flee. But though they’d scramble away, they’d only come back again when they knew I wasn’t looking. Those devils.

And when I’d complain that they’d managed to foil me again, my husband would say, “It’s not personal, dammit. Stop planting deer food and they won’t come.”

I despised the deer for not being discouraged by my efforts to thwart them, and I was hurt and irritated with my husband for not knowing what was at stake for me.

Then, two years ago, on Father’s Day, I was out in my garden and heard a strange bleating sound, just up the hill behind the house on the other side of the creek. As I began to walk across our lawn towards the creek to investigate, a doe stepped out from behind a tree on the hill where she’d been hiding, and looked down at me in a way I’d never seen a deer look. Her ears and head were actually bent foward in an aggressive position and she was staring directly at me. A head-on stare was an unusual pose for a deer, as they ordinarily looked out at me from the sides of their eyes. Not only that, but she was making a peculiar, snorting sound I’d never heard a deer make, either. It was as though she were growling a warning. I stopped still and looked up at her as the bleating continued, much closer this time. That’s when I realised: She was guarding her fawn. The cry I was hearing was the sound of her newborn. I stepped back and nodded. A mother looking out for her baby. Fair enough. I wasn’t about to chase them, that was for sure.

But as I stepped back, the doe did an odd thing. She began to sway on her feet. Then, in the most ungraceful way I’d ever seen a deer move, she seemed to stagger across the hill, directly across from where I stood on the lawn, and away from her baby. She stumbled dizzily, and then —God help me— her knees gave way and she collapsed. I gasped in shock as she began sliding down the hill towards me, unable to stop her fall. I knew any moment she would come tumbling over the retaining wall and onto the lawn where I stood.

It was a pile of logs gathered at the base of the fence that prevented her complete tumble over the wall. Now, as I watched in horror, she was lying on her side, thrashing, her legs tangled up in logs, desperately trying, but unable to get her footing back on the hill. After a few moments, she sank down and gave up. Laying her head back on the dirt she twisted around, and from her lying position, feebly but determinedly, she lifted her back head up and looked at me.

She wore that startled look one always sees on a deer. The look of prey that knows they are prey. You might think she was fearing for herself in her look, afraid of me, because she knew I’d always chased her kind away.

No. … There was something else… I felt something else in that look. It was the look of one mother to another. It went straight through my heart as surely as if she’d spoken to me. And, as though I were reading that mother’s look from my spirit instead of my brain, I looked back at her, too, directly into her eyes, and said, “Don’t worry. I’ll find your baby. I promise. And I promise she won’t be harmed.”

She held my look as though she were listening and understanding my words, my English words, which I’d said out loud to an animal, a wild creature that couldn’t speak. Then with one weak nod, she lay her head back one final time, looked up at the sky and… I saw her die. Hoping I was wrong in everything I was witnessing, I stayed to see if she might move. But as I stayed and watched her, those brown doe eyes slowly filmed over white. For sure, she was gone.

I turned and ran into the house, calling for my husband. He was on the phone with Tim, one of our sons, who’d called to wish him a “Happy Father’s Day.” He asked Tim to hold on a moment as he listened to my agitated words. Then he said into the phone, “Tim, I’ll have to let you go. We’ve got another deer emergency.”

And with that smart aleck remark, my husband followed me as I pointed out to where the doe lay, and then to where I knew I’d heard her fawn.

That remark to our son about ‘another’ deer emergency hadn’t done it, but what he said next did. “She’s not dead. She’s probably just resting. And I’m fairly certain there is no fawn.”

I turned on him. “I may not have been raised on a farm, but I’m not an idiot, “I snapped. “That deer is as dead as you can get, and her fawn is over there, on the other side of our creek.”

He could tell I meant business then, so with sigh, he climbed up over the retaining wall and gingerly approached that poor doe. Peering at her, he confirmed what I knew. “Yeah. She’s gone, alright.” Then standing he turned to me and asked, “Where did you hear the fawn?” When I pointed in the direction again, he said, “We’ll have to approach very quietly, or we might scare it.”

I followed him across the creek. I couldn’t see anything, but a moment later, he lifted his arm and whispered, “there.”

Sure enough, sitting comfortably in a bed of leaves, her front legs crossed, looking directly at us, with curiosity and no fear whatsoever, was the tiniest fawn I’d ever seen.

My husband’s tone was very different now. “Listen, if that doe died after giving birth, she probably was too old or too sick to survive it. That might mean she wasn’t able to feed this little thing, either. And that’s not good. If Animal Services can’t get any milk into her, she won’t make it.”

I was beside myself at those words. I’d made a promise and I was already trying to figure out, if my husband’s verdict were true, how I, a woman who’d spent the last three years chasing deer from her garden, was going to save this one.

Animal Services estimation was not so bleak, however. It took two of their vans to our home — one for the live animal and one for the dead — but they determined that the fawn would survive. She’d been fed one last time by her mother, and in fact still had a belly full of milk. She’d be cared for, then released when she was able to survive on her own. She’d probably live to eat my flowers another day.

As for her mother, I watched the man from Animal Services gently close her eyes. Then he and my husband wrapped her in a sheet and carried her down the hill into the back of the second waiting transport van. I watched as it drove away.

I am not a Hindu. But, the Anahata is the fourth primary chakra according to Hindi Yogic and Tantric traditions. It symbolises the consciousness of love, empathy, selflessness and devotion. On the psychic level, this centre of force inspires the human being to love, be compassionate, altruistic, devoted and to accept the things that happen in a divine way.

And wouldn’t you know it? The animal it is represented by is the deer.

I am not a Hindu, I’ll say again. But I know what I felt and I know what I experienced. That mother doe and I communicated that day. And by our bond of motherhood, we became more than two different species on opposites sides of an issue. We became more than predator and prey. With her dying breath, she looked at me, her enemy, and saw something in me that was like her. She knew she could ask me for help with the one thing left for her here to take care of, her one last, most precious thing.

I didn’t let her down.

My garden is very different now. I keep one giant pot of red geraniums up high on a porch where no animals can reach, as a reminder that beauty can never excuse arrogance. Now my yard is flooded with lavender.

And you know, it smells wonderful. What’s even more wonderful is seeing the deer there. We’re at peace with each other now.

I wish it were that easy to make peace within our species.

Note: This essay was published in Marin Magazine’s November 2010 issue

 

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

I am Ann Coulter

Today would have been the day I posted the last in my series on men, titled, “In Danger From The Outside World.” But, I’ve had to postpone because several events have occurred in the last two weeks that have prompted me to make this announcement:

I am Ann Coulter.

That’s right. She and I are the same person.

Look – this chart (Chart I) will prove it:

Patricia V. Davis Ann Coulter

age 51 47
height 5 ft. 3 inches 6 ft.
weight 124 unknown
Hair colour dark brown blonde
Eye colour black blue
Education Teaching Degree Law Degree
Residence California New York
Self-defence Can leg press 270 pounds Owns guns, has body guards

Though this chart does not show much similarity, if you look at our photos, you will see that Ann and I are wearing a similar beige, sleeveless blouse.

Therefore, because we have this one thing in common, Ann and I are identical.

Have I proven that point?

I hope not.

Now look at this chart (Chart II) :

Jesus Christ’s Beliefs Ann Coulter’s Beliefs

Bless those who persecute you! Bless, and do not curse! (Rom 12:14) 

Repay no one evil for evil! (Rom 12:17)

Do not avenge yourselves! (Rom 12:19)

“We need to execute people like John Walker Lindh in order to physically intimidate liberals.”— from a 2002 speech. 

“The fact of Islamo-Fascism is indisputable, “I find it tedious to detail the savagery of the enemy . . . I want to kill them. Why don’t Democrats? We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. ” in a speech at USC

Let not any filthy word go out of your mouth! But only good, so that it may give grace to the ones hearing! (Eph 4:29) 

Put off… anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, shameful speech out of your mouth! (Col 3:8

“Liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots.” —from her book, Treason 

There are a lot of Bad republicans. There are no good Democrats.”—CNN, July 21, 2003

If anyone says, I love God, and hates his brother, he is a liar. For if he does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen? (1 John 4:20) “I’m a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don’t you ever forget it.” —July 2006 

“Press passes can’t be that hard to come by if the White House allows that old Arab Helen Thomas to sit within yards of the President“-Feb 23

“My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.”

New York Observer interview, 2002

Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven. “Jesus’ distinctive message was: People are sinful and need to be redeemed, and this is your lucky day because I’m here to redeem you even though you don’t deserve it, and I have to get the crap kicked out of me to do it.” —2004 column
You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.”
But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also

Love your enemies! Bless those who curse you! Do good to those who hate you!…(Matt 5:44). 

For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? If you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others?

“I think we ought to nuke North Korea right now just to give the rest of the world a warning. Boom!…They’re a major threat. I just think it would be fun to nuke them…”reported by New York Observer, January 2007 

My question is this: If you don’t believe me when I say that Ann Coulter and I are one and the same, because we have beige blouses in common, why do we believe Ann Coulter when she claims to be ‘Christian,’ just because she has one thing in common with real Christians, which is, that she believes Jesus Christ is the Lord? After that, she deviates from Christian doctrine remarkably.

One cannot be a Christian “conservatively.” It’s all or nothing. Either one believes Jesus Christ is the Lord and Saviour and follows His Teachings (see Chart II) or one is not really a Christian.

You might ask, why do people say they’re Christians and try to get us to believe it, when they really aren’t Christians? The answer is the “Playground Principle.”

On a playground, it’s always the weakest kid who gets picked on. In order to protect himself, he has to have a tough, intimidating mouth, or another really big kid on his side.

Well, who’s a bigger kid than God?

The idea that we can annihilate all our enemies by invading their countries and/or taking over their governments is such a weak idea that it needs a big mouth and God backing it up, in an attempt to be impressive. That’s what these so-called “Conservative Christians” – I will coin a new term here and call them “Coulter Christians” because it’s much more appropriate – are attempting to do. By telling us that we are “idiots,” or “sick” or “ridiculous” because we see the weakness behind this methodology and by saying they have ‘God’ on their side, they are trying to intimidate us.

It also serves another purpose. Divisionist tactics and power in numbers. If we take Coulter Christians at their word that they really are Christians, we begin to view Christianity itself with disdain. That disparaging attitude puts true Christians everywhere on the defensive. For an example of this, I invite you to read this heartfelt post.

By deriding all Christians, we’re no better than those who hate all Muslims.

How can we tell the difference between ‘true Christians’ and ‘Coulter Christians?’ To quote Jesus of Nazareth again, “by the fruit they bear.”

Here is an example of the fruit that true Christianity bears:

 

 

The lovely young woman in this photo is IrishLuckylass, pictured here with her two lucky children. They’re lucky because she is their mother. I read this Lass’s blog almost every day, no matter how busy I get, because it’s an inspiration to me. She doesn’t write about world-shaking events, she writes about her life and how much she appreciates it, her children and how devoted she is to them. She writes about trying in all the ways she knows to be a good mother, a good daughter, a productive, loving human being.

IrishLuckyLass has had more than a fair share of trials in her life. But you might be tempted to dismiss them, because no matter what tragic thing has happened to her, she writes about finding, if not some good in it or some lesson to be learned, then at least some humour in it, as though bad fortune came her way so she could turn it into a good story for us all. Her Christianity has not made her bitter, angry or vengeful. Quite the contrary, the worst thing I’ve ever heard her say in her writings about the man she loved who betrayed her and his two remarkably beautiful children with her, is to call him (and I love this) “ass hat.”

When I asked her once how she managed to survive abandonment by her father, then a rape, followed by the desertion of her husband, (and more), she told me, “It’s my faith.”

Oh, but wait – she sometimes votes Republican!

So what?

Coulter Christians are no more true Republicans than they are true Christians.

Here is an example of the fruit “Synthetic Republican,” “Coulter Christian” mindset bears:

 

 

We all know who the man in this photo is. The following are quotes from his speeches and writings and you’ll find them remarkably like Ann Coulter’s and those of some other so-called Christians we know: (Replace the word ‘Jew’ for ‘Arab’ or ‘Muslim’)

1. “I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.” —from John Toland’s Biography, Adolf Hitler

2.“Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.” —Mein Kampf

3.“My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter…..How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.” —Mein Kampf

4. “We were convinced that the people needs and requires this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.” ( in a speech delivered in Berlin October 24, 1933)

5. Thus inwardly armed with confidence in God and the unshakable stupidity of the voting citizenry, the politicians can begin the fight for the ‘remaking’ of the Reich.” –Mein Kampf

6.“For this, to be sure, from the child’s primer down to the last newspaper, every theater and every movie house, every advertising pillar and every billboard, must be pressed into the service of this one great mission, until the timorous prayer of our present parlor patriots: ‘Lord, make us free!’ is transformed in the brain of the smallest boy into the burning plea: ‘Almighty God, bless our arms when the time comes; be just as thou hast always been; judge now whether we be deserving of freedom; Lord, bless our battle!’”—Mein Kampf

Have I made my point?

I hope so.

Because if we can’t see the difference between those who say they’re Christians and those who act like Christians, just because they’re both wearing the same blouse, then I really am Ann Coulter.

And she’s going to be plenty ticked off when my new credit card applications go through.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Switch to our mobile site