When I Was Eight

When I was eight, in the summertime my mother had to call me in from playing outdoors at least twice before I even acknowledged I’d heard her voice. Then I’d beg her to let me stay outside for a while longer, until she issued dire threats if I didn’t “come in right this minute.” It was only at that point that I would petulantly stomp back into the house.

Once inside, she’d grab onto me and try to hold me still as she “pre-cleaned” me before setting up my bath. She knew if she didn’t, my bathwater would turn muddy within minutes of my being placed in it. That was because when I was eight, I played in dirt ─  sat right down in it, made mud with it, dug up some very fine rocks and wiggling earthworms hiding beneath it. And so, my mother would put my hands and arms in the bathroom sink and attempt to shake off some of that dirt which had caked onto my arms, into the crevices and lines on the palms of my hands, around my cuticles and under my fingernails. After that, she’d lean down and attack the skin on my knees with a washcloth. My knees were literally black with grime, sweat, and tan. In fact, my skin was so dark from my playing out in the sun so long that she could never tell when she’d rubbed hard enough to get down past the dirt and just onto bare flesh, so I’d end up with raw skin from her efforts. I’d never even heard the word “sunscreen” back then, and when I was eight, I wouldn’t have cared if I had.

When I was eight, I wore my hair to my shoulders the same as I do now, except back then I was too busy being a kid to keep it neat. It stuck out and up in the way only coarse, thick hair can, and I was forever pushing my dirty hands through it to keep it out of my eyes. That’s why my mother also had the nightly task of pulling bits of branches out of my hair that I’d picked up from climbing trees or crawling through the woods in the “forts” we made. My hair was so wiry and tangled that once, a brush my mother was trying to force through it snapped right in half at the handle. In frustration, she had my hair cut pixie short. It did not look trendy, but it was convenient, and instead of being traumatized, I loved how my shadow now looked on the cement patio when I moved my head back and forth and wiggled my arms out to my sides ─ sort of like one of the dancing skeletons in my favorite cartoons. I looked like a shadow skeleton somewhat, because even though I ate three healthy meals a day and all the sugary candy I could buy with 25 cents a week, (which was a lot) I was downright skinny from moving so much, using my body so much for the things it was meant to do.

When I was eight, boys were just more people with whom to climb trees and have racing contests or rock-throwing contests. They were sometimes annoying because they were stronger and could beat me more often than not, and of course, I wanted to win. Some of them seemed to like bugs more than I did, too, and most certainly they often smelled bad. So, why would I care if creatures like that thought I was pretty or not? Why, with so much fun to be had, like running and climbing and sticking my hands in dirt, finding baby birds that had fallen out of trees and nursing them back to health, would I care myself, if I were pretty or not?

When I was eight and if for some reason we couldn’t play outside, my sister, cousins, and I made up games like “Spy” or sang songs out loud in the basement so we wouldn’t bother our parents who were upstairs, smoking, drinking coffee, and talking about stupid, boring stuff we had no interest in knowing about whatsoever. We held plays, and sometimes we could get our parents away from their stupid, boring stuff to come downstairs to watch them. My cousins, sister and I were all bossy, and we all argued about who was going to play what part. Our mothers would tell us to behave. We didn’t listen.

We didn’t meekly submit. Not to our mothers, not to our friends, not to anybody else’s idea of what we were worth. In that world it would have been unfathomable to know of another eight-year-old  girl who would hold in her tears while her mother put needles filled with poison in her face, just so she could “be beautiful.” In that world it would be unfathomable to want “boob jobs and nose jobs”, because we felt we were perfect the way we were.

We were real. Life was real.


Yes, Things are Changing—Deal with It! (Or, What I Learned in New York City)

This weekend, I had the pleasure of being in New York City, which despite the January onslaught of snow and wind, is always a wonderful place to visit. I was speaking at The Writer’s Digest Conference, and when I tell you it was an honor to be doing so, I don’t say that just so the organizers will read this and think I’m gracious. (But I hope they do.) I say it because the speakers were amazing, and I feel I learned more than I taught. But the two paramount things I learned, the two most fantastic things, were not taken away from any one particular talk or speaker. Here they are:  20-somethings and 30-somethings are marvelous, and the salvation of the human race will come from our advances in technology.

How did I get all this from a writers’ conference? I’m so glad you ask. There are those of you reading who would be well within your rights to assume that we writers are a stuffy, insular, snobbish and introverted lot. Well, okay…maybe some of us are. But those farty literati types seemed in short supply at this particular conference. At this conference, what I noticed was that the majority of the attendees were upbeat, democratic, and brimming with passion for their craft. Though the older people were no slouches in exhibiting these characteristics, naturally it was the younger set who displayed them most. But it wasn’t because of their naive optimism. Quite the contrary — their confidence in what the future holds for them in regards to the success of their writing careers, stems from something they have on their side to help them succeed that those of us who started on the writing and publishing track in the 1970’s did not ─ the internet and the technological leaps and bounds springing from that forthwith.


Last weekend, I listened as speakers talked about e-book sales, (Amazon sold more Kindle books this past year than paperback), making books into phone apps, publishing on Scribd and Smashwords and more.  It was a cross-generational meeting of the minds as the younger writers instructed the older writers on how all this stuff works (and work it does!) and older writers became excited at the realm of new possibilities to share their art. I saw one 70-year old get up and ask a 40-year-old speaker who’d written his book as a phone application how she could do that with her newspaper column.


But what I also loved was how the younger writers still crowded into rooms to hear older writers speak about what we knew, too, solely from our years and experience. Yeah, that’s right ─ the young’uns weren’t a bunch of little ‘know-it-alls’ — uninterested or unimpressed with what we older lot had to say. I heard from them many references to works by writers long dead, and you know, you can’t get any older than dead. There was respect there, coming from the young for the old; but equally important, from the old for the young. They wanted to speak to each other and learn from each other, in fact, were eager to do so.


I admit I was more than flattered to see some of the younger people ‘tweeting’ my remarks from my lecture room out into the world in real time. How ‘bout that? Hmmm... So, if there were fifty people in each room where that conference was held, how many more still who weren’t there physically still got to ‘hear’ what each speaker had to say?


So this is what I’m envisioning from all of this ─ a world where, if you can’t be at the place where the Dalai Lama is speaking, (or he’s been banned from your country) you can still just pick up your phone and get his words from your Twitter feed as he speaks them.  And if a politician spews out lies during a speech, you can fact check what he says on your iPad right there and then, and fire right back at him with a rebuttal via his email address or website. (It’ll be keeping high school teachers on their toes, for sure, when their students do this during their classes.)And when they tell us that we should be bombing this country or that, none of us anywhere in the world will buy into it, because one of our online poker buddies will be from said country, and we know what a good guy he is. We know his wife, his kids, and his worries, and guess what?─ Even though he’s wearing a rather odd-looking hat, we know he’s still just one of us. Is it any wonder the Chinese are trying to suppress Google?


The part I like best is what this means for any writer, in fact, anyone who has something to say – you can still say it with flowers, or you can try saying it in e-books, online websites, and blogs. You can get your word out without it being censored or spin-doctored by the mainstream media; you can gatecrash the publishing world without one nod of condescending consent from any literary agent or traditional house. You can browse the internet for hours looking for just the right book, because it will be out there and available to you immediately in some format. Same goes for films, art, and music. There will be no reason to try to put Julian Assange in jail, because Wikileaks will be obsolete. We will become a world of no secrets and therefore, no fear of the unknown or of each other. It will be just as ordinary via Skype to have a conversation face-to-face with a beloved friend in South Africa or Toowoomba as it is to have one with your next door neighbor.


We, the little people, will finally be able to have our say without dozens of blockades put up for our ‘protection’. There will be one god for everyone, and that will be the god of kindness, respect, and caring for all, because we will all know each other, and we will all learn from each other, whether a different nationality or a different generation.


On the day of the 25th anniversary of the space shuttle Challenger fall, oh, how I hope what I write here comes true. We mustn’t be leery of technology and scientific advance; we mustn’t hold it back, because despite any perceived and real risks involved in its development, it can save humankind.


Do I know what’s going to replace hardback books, or even if they will be replaced? No. But if they are replaced, will whatever replaces them be the “same”? Probably not. Just as printed books are not the same as scrolls, and when they updated Coca-Cola it no longer had cocaine in it. I’ll bet both those facts disappoint many. But I’m not one who looks in the rear view mirror while I’m trying to drive forward.


Did I tell you I’m learning to ‘tweet’?

The Angel and The Ladder (For Kzinti and Baria, with much affection and many thanks for your comments here)

Roger Moore as The Saint


Once upon a time, a man died and went up to Heaven, where Saint Peter was waiting for him at the Holy Gates.

“I’m very sorry,” said Saint Pete, “but I can’t let you in.”

The man was shocked and very disappointed.  “Why not, Saint Peter?” he asked. “Wasn’t I a good man on Earth?”

“You were a very good man, indeed,” replied Saint Pete.“But here’s what your problem was – you could not stop yourself from telling other people how to lead their lives. If they were making a mistake of some kind, you felt compelled to point it out to them.”

Once again, the man was shocked by Saint Peter’s words. “But I don’t understand, Saint Peter. Why was this a bad thing? I was just trying to help them. Isn’t that what we’re supposed to do on Earth -  help people?”

“Not in this instance,” replied Saint Peter sternly. “You never learned to mind your own business. And for that reason, I’m afraid you’ll have to go to Hell.”

The man pleaded with Saint Pete. “Please, Saint Peter, I didn’t mean any harm. I was just trying to help, that’s all. I didn’t know I was doing a bad thing. Please, please, give me another chance?”

Saint Peter looked at the man and could see that he honestly hadn’t meant any harm. Because that was so, he thought that perhaps he might bend the rules…just this once.  However, before he did, he would test the man’s sincerity. Unbeknownst to the man, of course.

“All right,” decided Saint Pete. “I’ll go to the Higher Ups and see what I can do. In the meantime, you wait in that room over there. Just go in, and close the door behind you.”

The room to which the man had been directed was large and empty, save for a bench. As directed, he closed the door as he went in, and sat on the bench, waiting for his verdict. And as he sat, he noticed there was a narrow, open archway which led to an anteroom at the far side, opposite to where he was sitting.

As he was pondering what might be in the anteroom, the door he’d closed opened, and an angel came in. He was carrying a very tall ladder.

“Hello,” said the angel. “I hope I’m not disturbing you. Do you mind if I come through? I’ve just got to take this ladder and leave it in that anteroom over there.”

“Please, go right ahead,” said the man. “You don’t need my permission.”

And then, an odd thing happened. The man watched as the angel walked across the room towards the anteroom, turned his ladder horizontally in his arms,  and attempted to walk through the narrow archway with it. Naturally, he was unable to get through, as the ladder held horizontally was now much too wide.

The man observed with incredulity as the angel made attempt after attempt to get through the archway while holding the ladder thusly. Each time, the ends of the ladder banged against the wall on either side of the opening, propelling the angel backwards, and making quite a mess of the walls it kept hitting, in the process.

Naturally, after about fifteen minutes of this, the angel was winded and perspiring.

“Whew!” he exclaimed. “I didn’t realize this was going to be so difficult.”

The man couldn’t believe what he was hearing. “Are you serious?” he blurted. “If you want to get through, hold the damn ladder vertically!”

The angel shook his head and looked at the man regretfully. “My friend,” he said, “this ladder’s not damned, but you are.”

And the next thing the man knew, he was in Hell.

_______________________

I can’t remember how old I was when my father told

me the story above, but I was still young enough that

my questions were only just starting to become

annoying to him.  Those questions were on every

subject from “Why do you support the war in Vietnam?”

to “Why don’t you ever do anything to stop all the

terrible things going on in this house?”

Since he couldn’t seem to come up with any reasonable

answers for me, the parable above was an attempt to

stave off the inevitable, which was that my

questioning of him would eventually go

from annoying to unbearable… for both of us.

Even my response to this story was not what he’d

hoped. He thought I’d feel forewarned that my quixotic

nature was taking me closer to Hades every day.  But

ironically, all it prompted was another litany of

questions: “What kind of angel is stupid enough to

behave like a human?” and “What kind of God would

send a man to Hell for questioning human stupidity?”

It wasn’t until many, many years later that I recognized

that my father had a point, though perhaps not in the

way he’d believed. Anyone at all, with an average

human intelligence, understands very well which

way one needs to hold a ladder in order to get it

through a narrow archway. But pretending that he

doesn’t, he accomplishes one thing – he can tell himself

he tried to get through with everything he had and

just couldn’t succeed.

The fact is, he doesn’t want to succeed. He says

he has to get through a door and deposit a ladder in

an anteroom, but he doesn’t truly want to.

He just wants to pretend to himself and everyone

else, that he really, really tried.

And because this is actually what he wants – that

illusion of the attempt of a completion of a ‘task’, which is

another word for a ‘change’ – rather than the actual

change – he doesn’t want anyone to point out to him

that his ‘attempt’ is in actuality no attempt at all.
He doesn’t need anyone getting in the way of
his self-deception. Like my father, it will more
than irritate him,  because by pointing it out, making him aware that you are aware that he’s lying to himself, you will make him hate himself and, as a result, (especially if your own attempts at change are real, and your desire to help him  is motivated out of genuine caring, rather than smug superiority) – he will hate you, too.

A fast way to hell, indeed.
Remember that the next time you

(metaphorically) observe an intelligent adult holding a ladder horizontally, trying to get through an archway.

Say nothing. Wish him “good luck,” and get out of his way.

Why Can’t They Just Ignore Each Other?

For those who don’t know him, please let me introduce my blog ‘neighbor’ and fellow writer for HS Radio magazine, Tommy Hames.

Tom and I disagree on almost every current issue, I’ve noticed. And when we disagree politically, socially, economically and spiritually, well…I won’t sugarcoat this ─ I think he’s wrong. Dead wrong.  And I think that I’m right.  And my guess would be Tom thinks I’m wrong, dead wrong (can you imagine?) and he’s right.

And yet, it’s a funny thing…I still like Tom. And he likes me. Based on replies to my posts, comments he’s made on his, I know he thinks about my perspective, even if he will never agree with me. And I do the same about his.

In fact, sometimes, at dinner, I will tell my husband some of the things about which Tom and I disagree, and my husband almost always says I’m right and Tom is wrong. (He’d be a madman not to, wouldn’t he? After all, Tom doesn’t cook  dinner for him.)

But, my husband and I talk about what Tom thinks and writes. And not once have we ever thought that Tom didn’t have a right to his beliefs, or perspectives. Not once have I ever thought him a person unworthy of my  regard. Not once have I ever called Tom a bad name.

“What about Tom?” you might ask. Since he’s so wrong, he must get angry at me for being so right, right?

Wrong.

In fact, the one and only time Tom displayed public annoyance
over something I wrote on my blog was because it personally involved him.

That one time, Tom was right and I was…well…wrong. And I apologized.

But guess what? Tom felt I didn’t have to apologize, and also felt I had a right to my thoughts. And then, he forgave me and forgot about it. Gracious and right, that was Tom, all in one day.

It was a bit hard to swallow.

Nonetheless, though I didn’t enjoy the taste of crow, I am so glad Tom disagrees with me and I with him, because he makes me think. He helps me remember that there are many sides to an issue, and that just as it’s happened in the past, someone will come along with a fact – a perspective- a news flash- that just might make me revisit my stance. Or at least, understand another stance more.

(Oh- it’s happened and I’m not ashamed to admit it.)

The fact that Tom and I are often diametrically opposed also teaches me to deal with my frustration over those oppositions in the same way that Tom does- with civility.

Here’s another thing. We’re friends. Yes indeed, Tom and I have become friends.

Here are some of the things Tom has done to show his friendship that in fact, some others who agree with me have not:

1) He has sent me emails congratulating me on the success of my book. He not only ‘friended’ my book fan page on Facebook, he got his daughter to do it, also.( Who also sent me a very nice note.)

2) He has asked my advice on his writing (which is very good, by the way) and thanked me for all of my help.

3) He compliments often on my work and thanks me for my friendship.

So from these, I also learned that just because someone disagrees with me, it doesn’t mean s/he can’t be my friend and wish me well, and just because someone does agree with me, it doesn’t necessarily mean s/he will be my friend or wishes me well.

Yeah- Tom and I are very odd, apparently, because we don’t hate each other’s guts and say disgusting things to each other. Because we believe that we live in a country where it is our constitutional right to disagree,  and where that very disagreement keeps a balance against the zealots and fanatics on either side of Tom’s perspective and mine.

And, because, despite the fact that we disagree, we share a love for ourselves, that spreads out to our fellow human beings.

And that, I think, is the root of it. People who hate and spread that hate, whether they are on the right side of any issue (mine, of course) or the wrong side of an issue, hate themselves first. Their reason for vehement, violent and nasty disagreement is not really fueled by frustration, but by a terrible fear that they are not respected, or worthy of respect.

Do I sound smug about all this? Well, maybe that’s because I am. And a little disturbed, too, by some of the things I’ve been reading in my VOX neighborhood lately.

So thanks, Tom, for respecting yourself enough that you don’t have to be mean to me when you’re always wrong and I’m always right.  You and the family should come over for a barbecue at our place sometime.

You do eat meat, of course, Tom – right?

Send to a friend

…. But, the Story Could Have Also Gone This Way…. (Satire)

Chicago, 1976

The 15-year-old boy was tall for his age, very dark, and rather skinny. Wearing a cheap, ill-fitting suit that only emphasized his gangly frame, he stood in the courtroom facing Judge Joseph Gary’s bench. His court-appointed public defender, Robert Klein,  of the law firm Fielden, Neebe and Scwab, stood beside him.

The judge spoke, “Mr. Klein, your client is accused of armed robbery at Giordano’s Pizzeria downtown. How do you plead?”

“Guilty, your honor,” replied Mr. Klein, “but with a request for a commuted sentence.”

“On what grounds?” demanded Judge Gary. “He shot Leo Spizzirri right in the leg. Leo dropped a five gallon container of tomato sauce. It splashed all over the red checkered tablecloths. They were cleaning that stuff up for weeks. Leo’s still walking with a limp.”

“Your honor, this is my client’s first offense. And he’s had some mitigating circumstances,” continued Mr. Klein, smoothly.

The judge sighed, “Let’s hear ‘em.”

Clearing his throat, Klein began his impassioned defense. “Just look at this kid’s skin, your honor. It’s black, but not really black. His mother was white and his father was a foreigner, born somewhere in Africa. Not only that, his father left him. And then his mother married some Indian guy or something, and dragged this poor kid to another godforsaken foreign country. And he suffered there, your honor. He was poor. To top it all off, his mother left him to live with his white grandparents. What must that have been like, for a black kid to live with two old, white people? He could never belong. What kind of a mother would do that?”

Mr. Klein looked at Judge Gary pleadingly and continued, “Your honor, my client didn’t have his mother’s love, and hardly knew his father. He’s a half-breed. A mutt, really. He doesn’t know where he fits in society.  He has low self-esteem because his parents abandoned him. No wonder he committed a crime. It was a cry for help. This kid needs our assistance, not our prisons.”

After Klein’s defense, Judge Gary had tears in his eyes. Even Leo Spizzirri, despite himself, was moved. He sat in his courtroom seat, shifting his bad leg uncomfortably.

The judge looked at the defendant silently for a moment, thinking.

Finally he spoke directly to him, “Okay, kid, I’m gonna give you a break, because I see something in you. You get a second chance and I hope you use it wisely.”

He banged his gavel down. “Sentence for Barack Hussein Obama commuted. Court adjourned.”
———————-

Obama was smiling his megawatt smile as he left the courtroom. He couldn’t believe his paid-for-by-the city attorney had managed to pull this off. He thought he was a goner, for sure. But that ‘victim’ act had worked great. Though that bothered him on some levels he couldn’t figure out, he’d remember that in future. Just in case.

Since he was just shy of his 16th birthday, he was still a minor, so the court set him up to live as a foster child.  They found a family for him in Marin City, California, which was one of the most exclusive areas on the west coast of the country. He got an upscale education at Tamalpais High School, taking many poetry and literature classes. He had teachers who cared about him and nurtured his talents, which he discovered, were in the area of writing lyrics and performing. His musical abilities eventually led to him being signed with an up-and-coming rap group.

Despite this success, he still felt like an ‘outsider,’ still felt cheated. Instead of reveling in his talents and his good fortune at being placed with the Shakur family, he resented everything about himself and his upbringing. He changed his name from Barack to Tupac, and performed onstage as Tupac Shakur. He made his first album, the lyrics of which were aimed at the problems facing young black males, but it was publicly criticized for its graphic language and images of violence by and against law enforcement.

Though he’d never actually lived the ‘ghetto life,’ he embraced the lifestyle of the real underprivileged and uneducated. He had himself tattooed with street gang symbols. He got in trouble with the law, sometimes severely, but always managed, as he had that first time back in Chicago, to find a white, liberal lawyer who felt sorry for him, and pleaded his case in court as “a victim of society.”

In fact, Tupac glamorized victimhood to the point that many of his worshipful, young male fans, who’d been truly forced by circumstances of birth to grow up in the ghettoes, began to believe poverty, violence, and criminality was the preferred existence to which they should aspire. Not only that, but since Tupac had moved from Chicago to the west, it’s believed that he may well have been one of the defining forces in the so-called “East Coast –West Coast” rivalry that still exists in the hip-hop industry today.

(Fans insist that it wasn’t that Tupac didn’t like the extra sunshine and healthier lifestyle that he was able to enjoy in his new home in California, it was just that he never got over the fact that he had to leave behind that really fabulous Chicago pizza.)

Shakur made album after album, with names like Strictly 4 My N.I.G.G.A.Z. and Thug Life: Volume I. He became enormously popular, so much the dangerous, yet dashing face of the outlaw, that he dated Madonna, as every man who is famous in this sort of fashion eventually does.  She is reported to have wanted to bear his child. (And that part’s not a joke.)

Not even 25 years old, Tupac sank deeper and deeper into a life of too much fast money, too many drugs, and crime after crime. He was surrounded and encouraged by an entourage of men and women who wanted that same exclusivity that he did, and were willing to sell their souls as hangers-on or sex-objects to be near it.

And always, always, he maintained that his race and his circumstances of birth should excuse him for his desires and activities. He went to prison several times on charges from sexual assault to manslaughter, always insisting on his innocence, always managing to get through, and always remaining the most successful rap artist of all time. Shakur is the only artist ever to have an album at number one on Billboard 200 while serving a prison sentence. The album stayed at the top of the charts for five weeks, selling 240,000 copies in its first week, setting a record for highest first week sales for a solo male rap artist at the time.

His bad habits eventually caught up with him, however.

On the night of September 7, 1996, Shakur attended the Mike Tyson – Bruce Seldon boxing match at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. After leaving the match, one of his associates spotted 21- year-old  Orlando “Baby Lane” Nelson, a member of the Southside Crips in the MGM Grand lobby, and informed Shakur. Shakur then attacked Anderson, with his entourage assisting. The fight was captured on the hotel’s video camera. A few weeks earlier, Anderson and a group of Crips had robbed a member of Shakur’s entourage in a shoe store, precipitating Shakur’s attack.

After the brawl, Shakur went to meet up with some friends, riding as a passenger in a black sedan.  At approximately 11:15 p.m., a white, four-door, late-model Cadillac, with an unknown number of occupants pulled up to the sedan’s right side, rolled down one of the windows, and rapidly fired  at Shakur. He was struck by four rounds, with bullets hitting him in the chest, the pelvis, and his right hand and thigh. One of the rounds apparently ricocheted into Shakur’s right lung.

While in Critical Care Unit on the afternoon of September 13, 1996, Shakur died of internal bleeding; doctors attempted to revive him but could not impede his hemorrhaging. The official cause of death was noted as respiratory failure and cardiopulmonary arrest in connection with multiple gunshot wounds.

Shakur’s body was cremated. Some of his ashes were later mixed with marijuana and smoked by members of his band.

Throughout all his misspent life, not anyone could deny that Shakur was full of talent and intelligence. He remains one of the best-loved artists, and sales of his records continue posthumously. We will all always wonder, especially his lawyers who defended him, and others who emulated him, what his life achievements could have been.

If only he hadn’t had the misfortune to be born Black.

Barack as a young man

The Sanctity of Marriage and The Colour Purple

Weddingrings

In the fifty-two years I’ve been on the planet, I’ve experienced great joys in my life. But I’ve also experienced many great tragedies. Only those who are closest to me know of them, and will ever know what they cost me.

Yet, as much as I’ve suffered because of those tragedies, I’m glad of them in many ways, because not only did they make me stronger, they made me more compassionate. Having been judged and condemned, and hurt by the unfairness of it, I really try as hard as I can to walk in the shoes of others before I condemn or judge myself.

Yet, when I do come to the point where I feel no amount of compassion can help me excuse the acts of one human being against another, I become so outraged that it’s better for me to withdraw for a while, spend time in my garden, say, and think things through.

As a result, I haven’t been commenting much on my neighbour’s blogs since the election here in the United States has been heating people up, but I’ve been reading everything. And when I do comment, I’m very careful, trying to think things through,trying to see things from all perspectives, trying not to lash out and accuse.

But enough is enough.

I’m referring to the term, “the sanctity of marriage.” I have been hearing it a lot on blogs and on the telly because it’s election time. And I have to admit, it’s making my blood boil.

Because those who make that statement, ” I believe in the sanctity of marriage,” believe that just because they make it, they alone have a God-given right to determine how a segment of the human population can live.  A segment, who, if we observe nature carefully, we can see exists amongst all living creatures, not just amongst humans. A segment who have been naturally selected by nature as its clever way to keep the population down, without denying them the one joy granted to mankind — the ability to love, mentally, spiritually, and physically.

Well, let’s examine that statement:

Webster’s Definition of ‘Sanctity’- The quality of being ‘Holy’

Webster’s Definition of ‘Marriage’ – the state of being united to a person in a voluntary and contractual relationship recognized by law.

So, ‘sanctity’ and ‘marriage’ are not linked together in the dictionary, and in fact, mean two separate things. But when put together and stated by heterosexuals, those heterosexuals mean that to them, marriage is a holy, legal union to which only heterosexuals are entitled, because by this very definition and belief, only heterosexuals can be holy and only heterosexuals can uphold a holy, legal union.

And so, there is the insidious melding once again of church and state. Why? because they’re not talking church, synagogue or even mosque marriage here, blessed by a cleric, when they say “sanctity of marriage”. They’re talking state marriages by a non-secular, government official.

And let’s examine the ‘holy unions’ of some of the very people who tout this belief, “Marriage Sanctity”, “Sanctity Marriage” the loudest:

First of all, some go out of their way to proclaim themselves, “Staunchly heterosexual.” And that alone makes me wonder. ‘Staunchly?’ You either are or you aren’t heterosexual.  There’s no adverb needed, unless for some reason, you need to convince your own self how ‘staunchly’ you feel about your own heterosexuality.

But, who cares, anyway? I certainly don’t. When I encounter new people, what they may or may not be doing sexually in their own bedrooms does not in any way affect my marriage or me, unless they’re registered child molesters who are now living right next door.

Frankly, I think the ones who do care are just plain nosy.

It’s like saying when you meet someone, “Hi, I’m Dick. Say, I put my penis in a vagina. Before I shake your hand, can you tell me where you put yours?”

But the ‘sanctity of marriage’ types go even further than that. They actually lie to others and themselves about the verbiage, ‘holy marriage’. They know and we all know that unholy heterosexual marriages abound. Heterosexuals get married for all kinds of ‘unholy’ reasons. They marry for money, they marry to have someone to iron their shirts, they marry because their biological clocks are ticking and any stud or brood mare will do.They marry someone much older who they don’t love, because they want financial security and can’t wait till the old bastard dies. They marry someone straight out of the schoolroom, because they want to deny their fading youth, their comb overs and their spreading gut.

Every month it seems, there’s the minister in the news who has a lovely wife and three beautiful kids, but who’s boinking a male prostitute and lying about it. There’s the ordinary woman who uses the term, but is divorced from a loser who left her and his kids to fend for themselves. Or, like in my own case, an ex-husband who believed in the ‘sanctity of marriage’ (meaning he’s repulsed by gays) and promised his wife a happy marriage if she moved overseas with him, where he then ignored her and spent his time on another woman.

Sanctified marriages, all.

There are the holy men who talk about the sanctity of marriage. The ones who take a “vow of chastity” Another deceptive term, which translates to mean a “vow not to sleep with consenting adult females, but with unsuspecting little boys, instead.” And then have it hidden by the ‘sanctity’ of the church.

Then, of course, there’s John McCain’s idea of the sanctity of marriage— Leave your sick wife for a younger, hotter one. And Sarah Palin’s idea of the sanctity of marriage, (and motherhood)—force your seventeen-year-old to become a wife long before she’s ready for your own personal gain, bind her for life to a boy-man who’s not much of anything and most likely never will be.

And as this goes on and on, this disgusting hypocrisy which we are on the verge of making into law, I have a lot of anger and a lot of questions:

1) How can the people who talk like this live with themselves?

How can they call themselves or their relationships “holier” than my good friend and neighbour’s, a human being filled with compassion for his country and fellow man, who lovingly nursed his lifelong partner through sickness,spending his savings on medical care,then watched him die and is forever missing him; yet was not allowed to make this very blessed union between two loving, caring individuals legal?

2) How have those of us who see not only the unfairness of it, but the out-and-out wickedness of it, allow it to get so much airtime? Dismiss it because, even though we don’t agree with it, it doesn’t actually affect us, because we just happen to have been born heterosexual?

And the most important question of all, the one that makes me angriest is this:

3) Why in hell is every gay man and woman not openly and fiercely protesting this? Is it because they have bought into it, and they really do think they are evil and unholy, unworthy, somehow, of the rights the rest of us can legally enjoy?

Is it because they are scared to shake the status quo, find it more comfortable to hide and lie because they are able to?

What I mean by “able to” is that race can’t be hidden, but homosexuality can. However, if every gay person’s skin was, say, the colour purple, they couldn’t hide. Then, to the “sanctity of marriage” types purple skin would = gay, which would = unholy and unsuitable for marriage. Or even, maybe, shaking hands.

What then?

You see, this is why I haven’t been writing about this election.

An Alternative Universe* (Satire)

I’ve been away from my blog for more than two weeks because I was in an alternate universe. No, really. I got there by spaceship. I wish you could have been there. It was very intriguing.

Because in the alternate universe I visited, Barack and Michelle Obama had white skin and John McCain and Sarah Palin, along with their spouses, had black skin.

My goodness, you should have seen the change in perception by the alternate universe American people.

Instead of saying that Obama’s name was “too radical and Muslim,” the newspapers, TV and radio announcers in the alternate universe praised his name for its spiritual meaning, which is “Blessed.” They marveled at the determination and hard work it took for (white) Barack Obama to graduate at the top of his class at Harvard University. The fact that he grew up in Hawaii, was not seen as making him “too exotic and different,” but as giving him a “broader perspective on all the various lifestyles of the three hundred million American people.”

The praise for (white) Obama went on, for how he spent three years as a brilliant community organizer working to help poor people,how he created a voter  voter registration drive that registered 150,000 new voters and how became President of the Harvard Law Review. (The title “First Black President of Harvard Law review had to go to some other guy, because in this alternate universe, remember, Barack Obama is white.) .

The pundits on alternate universe FOX news said that (white) Obama showed “real leadership qualities”, because he spent twelve years as a (white) Constitutional Law professor, eight years as a (white) State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, and became (white) chairman of the State Senate’s Health and Human Services committee. What an achievement of (white) Obama that he spent four years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran’s Affairs committees.

In addition, everyone on FOX agreed they were in awe of him for beating the heavily favored candidate, Hillary Clinton, and winning the Democratic nomination, while raising more money than any other Presidential candidate in history.  All of these accomplishments proved that he would be “a great (white) president,” they did report, on that alternate universe FOX News.

And his family morals? They went rhapsodized about them, too. How he’s been married to the same (white) woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful (white) daughters with her. That they were “true (white) Christians,” because they did all this while attending (white) Protestant churches.

And the ‘alternate universe Katie Couric’ practically kissed the (white) Michelle Obama’s feet, because not only did (white) Michelle, just like her husband, graduate from Harvard law school, she had such “great family principles” that she gave up her position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community. And then, she even gave that up to raise her family.

“American women everywhere can identify with (white) Michelle, because she buys her clothes off the rack, puts her (white) husband and (white) kids first, and has true, down-home, (white) American values,” is what that ‘alternate universe Katie’ stated for the news cameras, while smiling her very pretty smile.

On the other hand, in that same alternate universe, the unfortunate (black) Sarah Palin, was widely criticized for being the “typical black woman who gives her children outrageous, ‘anti-American’ names, like ‘Bristol’, ‘Track’, ‘Willow’, ‘Piper’, and ‘Trig’.” The same was said for her husband’s nickname of ‘First Dude’. Way too black.

And the fact that said husband didn’t register to vote until he was twenty-five, and was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, was not ignored as it is by the media in our universe, but was being perceived as an example that he’s the “typical” black man who lacks responsibility, while at the same time, trying to lead a half-assed rebellion that would result in ethnic chaos the likes of which the country hadn’t seen since the U.S. Civil War and the race riots of the sixties. 

It was described on television in that alternative universe that the American people believed that, “It was just like a Black” to eat something peculiar like ‘mooseburgers,’ and shoot wolves from an airplane. “Just like a Black” to be so shiftless and irresponsible that she attends 5 colleges in 6 years before graduating from the University of Idaho, and then tries to run for Vice-president, by saying that all this had made her “well-grounded.”

And the alternative universe Katie Couric reported that the alternate universe American people perceived (black) Sarah Palin as just the usual, nervy, “uppity” black woman to also state that even though her total resume is being a beauty queen, a sports announcer at a local TV station, then a PTA President; then serving only four years on a city council and six years as the mayor of a small town (which she left in debt), and then only 20 months as the governor of a small state, where she wasted 400 million tax dollars on a bridge that was never completed, makes her qualified to be a 72-year-old heart-beat away from the most important job in the world.

And also that, while (black) governor Sarah staunchly advocated abstinence only, with no other option for sex education in her state’s school system, her unwed (black) teenage daughter became pregnant, an “outlandish and very typical of ‘Negroes,’ thing to happen”, is what the alternate universe FOX News said.

But the most criticism by the press and the Christian Right in that alternate universe was heaved on the (black) John and Cindy McCain. “(Black) John McCain cheated on his first wife with a rich heiress. He left his disfigured wife and married that heiress the next month,” said one leading TV evangelist.  “He’s no family man.”

“(Black) John McCain was knee-deep in the Keating Savings and Loan Scandal more than twenty years ago, which caused the same financial crisis then that the country is in now. Because he’s Black, he’s lying about it. Furthermore, he’s no war hero, either. In typical wasteful, Black fashion, the military lost five planes because of him, and he was shot down by the Viet Cong infantry because he couldn’t fly a plane properly,” reported The Conservative Times.

“He might have even done it on purpose, because he’s in league with terrorists. Maybe he wasn’t a prisoner of war at all. Maybe he was a spy,” that article stated.

“(Black) Cindy McCain spent three hundred thousand dollars on one outfit, and is a drug addict,” said one PTA, Christian, hockey mom in that alternative universe, “and those are not the kind of values I want passed on to my children.”

The funny thing was, with this totally different perception of facts going on in that alternate universe, the outcome of who the winner of the presidential race would be was still not so ‘black and white.’ It was still very, very close.  Do you know why?

Because in the alternative universe I visited, Joe Biden, the Democratic Vice Presidential candidate running with Obama, was gay.

And, since nobody, in any universe, apparently, thinks a gay man or woman should be allowed the same inalienable rights of, “all men are created equal,” and “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” then of course, nobody would want one to be vice-president.

* Many thanks to Barry H. for forwarding much of  the political information in this blog. It’s been researched and is accurate. (And I’ve just learned that a parady similar to this was presented on the Jon Stewart Show. But it is too late, I’ve just spent two hours writing it.

And many thanks to Michelle Solange for her rendition of “Black Sarah.”

Thank Heaven for X and Y (I Don’t Mean the Chromosomes)

It’s good to be back. My garden, after weeks of neglect, is once again blooming. Having a garden is just like having a life. You have to attend to it every so often, pull out the weeds, expose it to more sunshine and nourishment where needed, in order for it to flourish. I also had a remarkable visit around my growing blog neighbourhood. It was impossible to leave comments everywhere, but I so enjoyed reading about everyone’s activities, seeing all the photos and artwork, hearing the music and musing over the poetry and stories. I’ve said it before —what an extraordinary group of people, what a wealth of talent we have at our fingertips every day. It sure beats reality TV by a long ways.

Here’s something else I discovered whilst reading. Generations X and Y will save not only humanity, but the planet Earth itself. They are politically-involved and astute, they’re compassionate and global-thinking, they are street-smart and tech-savvy, environmentally-focused, entrepreneurial and optimistic. They have endless imaginations and boundless enthusiasm. They embrace their lives and their loves. They’re not easily defeated by the state of the world the way we’ve older generations have left it, either. I’m really, really thankful that we Baby Boomers didn’t completely screw things up for them. And let’s face it— we’ve sure come close.

I don’t know what happened to many of us after we hit 40. We suddenly stopped worrying about our legacy to the younger generations, and instead focused on not getting wrinkles. We focus on our weight and our portfolios and not at all on our children and what they might be missing from their lives– our leadership, our support, our encouragement and most of all, our respect for who they are and who they want to become. There is that portion of us who are that selfish and self-absorbed. The word “parenting” to many of us is a verb no different than “networking,” “exercising,” “investing.” We expect our children to be reflections of our achievements, rather than individuals with needs and dreams of their own.


Then there’s the group of us who sit around in metaphorical rockers and shawls, worn-out, remembering our youth and our one ‘big claim’ to immortality—Woodstock—wondering what happened to it all. That portion of us sighs and says, “We were so young,” as though having any values at all besides a longing for long-term health care and social security benefits, is naïve foolishness that disappears with the onset of menopause and swelling prostate glands.


What a picture we present to young people of their future —shallowness or uselessness. No wonder so many of them feel anxious or depressed. And instead of addressing what they’re feeling, we quickly and remorselessly diagnose them—ADHD, bi-polar, social-anxiety disorder, etc. etc. Then we medicate them and continue with our heads in the sand, just waiting to die, hoping it will be quick and painless.


We let Gen X and Gen Y down. A good portion of us stopped worrying about wars when it would no longer be us specifically who had to stand in the way of the bullets.

I remember asking my husband about the invasion on Iraq, “Where are the musicians this time around? How come they’re not protesting?”


It was a fair question, I thought. Some of the same musicians from the 60’s and 70’s were still commanding huge audiences, so why were they not rallying as they’d done back then?


His to the point response made me cringe, “Volunteer army,
Clear Channel.”

And even though the older generation retain most of the financial power in the world, we’re the ones whinging the most about rising fuel costs and real estate busts. Yet did we do anything to prevent either? Or were we as myopic as ever? Did we ever take the younger generations seriously as they protested and tried to educate us on what we were doing to the environment and to the economy? And ultimately, to them?


Furthermore, if I hear one more old fart professor bleat on about how hooked up Gen Y is to technology and how adversely it’s affecting his university classroom, I think I’ll hit him over the head with my new laptop that I’m just now figuring out how to use.

What alternatives have we left our young people? Where else can they find answers to their questions? They’ve come to us in the past and we haven’t helped them. So they‘re seeking guidance elsewhere, using technological advances as they should be used, for the most part—for the greater good. Oh, there are exceptions. There is the occasional young sociopath who wants to use YouTube to record the beating of a classmate. But the youth I encounter on a daily basis through VOX and through interacting with my own children is seeking knowledge and/or creating their art through the internet. They, like my unattended garden, are finding their own way to grow, but with just a little encouragement from us, they’d be able to thrive.

And those of us older folk who acknowledge them and embrace them, not only for what they are doing, what they are trying to accomplish, and for what they can teach us, are earning their respect. Yes, that’s right- earning it. (Read this blog to see what I mean.)
Youth asks us, with open hearts and open minds, to be both their mentors and their friends, and I for one, am eternally grateful to be invited to do so. Because like this man, this man, and this woman, (all admittedly over fifty) there still exists a portion of us of ‘a certain age’ who will go to our graves believing that idealism is not just for the young.

The flame of a visionary never flickers with time. In fact, it burns taller and steadier the closer it gets to the candle’s end.

(This post is dedicated to all my Gen X and Y neighbours, my sons, and my writers at Harlots Sauce Radio.)

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

I am Ann Coulter

Today would have been the day I posted the last in my series on men, titled, “In Danger From The Outside World.” But, I’ve had to postpone because several events have occurred in the last two weeks that have prompted me to make this announcement:

I am Ann Coulter.

That’s right. She and I are the same person.

Look – this chart (Chart I) will prove it:

Patricia V. Davis Ann Coulter

age 51 47
height 5 ft. 3 inches 6 ft.
weight 124 unknown
Hair colour dark brown blonde
Eye colour black blue
Education Teaching Degree Law Degree
Residence California New York
Self-defence Can leg press 270 pounds Owns guns, has body guards

Though this chart does not show much similarity, if you look at our photos, you will see that Ann and I are wearing a similar beige, sleeveless blouse.

Therefore, because we have this one thing in common, Ann and I are identical.

Have I proven that point?

I hope not.

Now look at this chart (Chart II) :

Jesus Christ’s Beliefs Ann Coulter’s Beliefs

Bless those who persecute you! Bless, and do not curse! (Rom 12:14) 

Repay no one evil for evil! (Rom 12:17)

Do not avenge yourselves! (Rom 12:19)

“We need to execute people like John Walker Lindh in order to physically intimidate liberals.”— from a 2002 speech. 

“The fact of Islamo-Fascism is indisputable, “I find it tedious to detail the savagery of the enemy . . . I want to kill them. Why don’t Democrats? We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. ” in a speech at USC

Let not any filthy word go out of your mouth! But only good, so that it may give grace to the ones hearing! (Eph 4:29) 

Put off… anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, shameful speech out of your mouth! (Col 3:8

“Liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots.” —from her book, Treason 

There are a lot of Bad republicans. There are no good Democrats.”—CNN, July 21, 2003

If anyone says, I love God, and hates his brother, he is a liar. For if he does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God whom he has not seen? (1 John 4:20) “I’m a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don’t you ever forget it.” —July 2006 

“Press passes can’t be that hard to come by if the White House allows that old Arab Helen Thomas to sit within yards of the President“-Feb 23

“My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building.”

New York Observer interview, 2002

Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven. “Jesus’ distinctive message was: People are sinful and need to be redeemed, and this is your lucky day because I’m here to redeem you even though you don’t deserve it, and I have to get the crap kicked out of me to do it.” —2004 column
You have heard that it was said, “An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.”
But I say to you, do not resist an evil person; but whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also

Love your enemies! Bless those who curse you! Do good to those who hate you!…(Matt 5:44). 

For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? If you greet only your brothers, what more are you doing than others?

“I think we ought to nuke North Korea right now just to give the rest of the world a warning. Boom!…They’re a major threat. I just think it would be fun to nuke them…”reported by New York Observer, January 2007 

My question is this: If you don’t believe me when I say that Ann Coulter and I are one and the same, because we have beige blouses in common, why do we believe Ann Coulter when she claims to be ‘Christian,’ just because she has one thing in common with real Christians, which is, that she believes Jesus Christ is the Lord? After that, she deviates from Christian doctrine remarkably.

One cannot be a Christian “conservatively.” It’s all or nothing. Either one believes Jesus Christ is the Lord and Saviour and follows His Teachings (see Chart II) or one is not really a Christian.

You might ask, why do people say they’re Christians and try to get us to believe it, when they really aren’t Christians? The answer is the “Playground Principle.”

On a playground, it’s always the weakest kid who gets picked on. In order to protect himself, he has to have a tough, intimidating mouth, or another really big kid on his side.

Well, who’s a bigger kid than God?

The idea that we can annihilate all our enemies by invading their countries and/or taking over their governments is such a weak idea that it needs a big mouth and God backing it up, in an attempt to be impressive. That’s what these so-called “Conservative Christians” – I will coin a new term here and call them “Coulter Christians” because it’s much more appropriate – are attempting to do. By telling us that we are “idiots,” or “sick” or “ridiculous” because we see the weakness behind this methodology and by saying they have ‘God’ on their side, they are trying to intimidate us.

It also serves another purpose. Divisionist tactics and power in numbers. If we take Coulter Christians at their word that they really are Christians, we begin to view Christianity itself with disdain. That disparaging attitude puts true Christians everywhere on the defensive. For an example of this, I invite you to read this heartfelt post.

By deriding all Christians, we’re no better than those who hate all Muslims.

How can we tell the difference between ‘true Christians’ and ‘Coulter Christians?’ To quote Jesus of Nazareth again, “by the fruit they bear.”

Here is an example of the fruit that true Christianity bears:

 

 

The lovely young woman in this photo is IrishLuckylass, pictured here with her two lucky children. They’re lucky because she is their mother. I read this Lass’s blog almost every day, no matter how busy I get, because it’s an inspiration to me. She doesn’t write about world-shaking events, she writes about her life and how much she appreciates it, her children and how devoted she is to them. She writes about trying in all the ways she knows to be a good mother, a good daughter, a productive, loving human being.

IrishLuckyLass has had more than a fair share of trials in her life. But you might be tempted to dismiss them, because no matter what tragic thing has happened to her, she writes about finding, if not some good in it or some lesson to be learned, then at least some humour in it, as though bad fortune came her way so she could turn it into a good story for us all. Her Christianity has not made her bitter, angry or vengeful. Quite the contrary, the worst thing I’ve ever heard her say in her writings about the man she loved who betrayed her and his two remarkably beautiful children with her, is to call him (and I love this) “ass hat.”

When I asked her once how she managed to survive abandonment by her father, then a rape, followed by the desertion of her husband, (and more), she told me, “It’s my faith.”

Oh, but wait – she sometimes votes Republican!

So what?

Coulter Christians are no more true Republicans than they are true Christians.

Here is an example of the fruit “Synthetic Republican,” “Coulter Christian” mindset bears:

 

 

We all know who the man in this photo is. The following are quotes from his speeches and writings and you’ll find them remarkably like Ann Coulter’s and those of some other so-called Christians we know: (Replace the word ‘Jew’ for ‘Arab’ or ‘Muslim’)

1. “I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.” —from John Toland’s Biography, Adolf Hitler

2.“Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.” —Mein Kampf

3.“My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God’s truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter…..How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.” —Mein Kampf

4. “We were convinced that the people needs and requires this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.” ( in a speech delivered in Berlin October 24, 1933)

5. Thus inwardly armed with confidence in God and the unshakable stupidity of the voting citizenry, the politicians can begin the fight for the ‘remaking’ of the Reich.” –Mein Kampf

6.“For this, to be sure, from the child’s primer down to the last newspaper, every theater and every movie house, every advertising pillar and every billboard, must be pressed into the service of this one great mission, until the timorous prayer of our present parlor patriots: ‘Lord, make us free!’ is transformed in the brain of the smallest boy into the burning plea: ‘Almighty God, bless our arms when the time comes; be just as thou hast always been; judge now whether we be deserving of freedom; Lord, bless our battle!’”—Mein Kampf

Have I made my point?

I hope so.

Because if we can’t see the difference between those who say they’re Christians and those who act like Christians, just because they’re both wearing the same blouse, then I really am Ann Coulter.

And she’s going to be plenty ticked off when my new credit card applications go through.

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Look Harder

“Look harder.”

Gee…did I just hear you say that again? You’re an English teacher. Surely you must know that one can’t look “harder” at written words on a page.

One can look “longer,” delve more deeply into the meaning of those words, if one can read them, that is, but one can’t look “harder.”

Yet, at least once a week, with distaste and fury layered through your voice, you say it to one of your first-year (seventh grade) pupils.

A girl today, I see.

A twelve-year old girl, whose life is already a misery. On the edge of puberty, her breasts feel sore all the time and, much to her constant mortification, one is growing faster than the other. No matter what blouse she wears to school, this is noticeable. The boys in her class often point to her chest, whispering and laughing behind her back. She hears them and wants to die. She feels she has nothing to balance this physical “anomaly” because to her mind, the other girls in her class are so pretty and sophisticated compared to her. The other girls in her class know how to flirt, while she just gets tongue-tied. And while the other girls in her class still maintain that smooth, soft complexion of their baby years, her face is already always breaking out.

Apart from her uneven breasts and pimples, her feelings of social ineptitude, she’s “stupid,” she’s been told.

By her older brother, when she can’t read the ingredients on their box of breakfast cereal, or when, in a rush of shyness, she’s struck mute when his friends come over to visit. “Don’t pay any attention to my sister. She’s stupid,” is his way of explaining her silence to them.

Her mother agrees. Oh, not that her mother actually says the word out loud, she just looks at her daughter pityingly when shown her marks. “Well, honey,” mother sighs, “I guess not everybody can be good at school.”

But, this young girl is not “stupid.” She has dyslexia.

When you, her teacher, place this before her:

“…after he was ushered into this world of sorrow and trouble, by the parish surgeon, it remained a matter of considerable doubt whether the child would survive to bear any name at all; in which case it is somewhat more than probable that these memoirs would never have appeared…”

This is what she sees:

“…after he saw ushereb otni this worlp of worros and rtoudle, by the barisp noeqrus, ti remaineb a rettam of consiberadle boubt whether eht chilp pluow survive ot dear yna name ta all; in which esac ti si tahwemos more than bropaple taht these sriomem woulp reven have addearep…”

Yet, all throughout her seven years of schooling so far, not one person in her life has noticed. Her brother, being a child, couldn’t notice. Her mother, not having had much education herself, might not notice. But you – her teacher? Why didn’t you notice?

I know why. You really didn’t want to be a teacher, did you? You wanted to be…hmmm…let me guess…a writer? …An actor, maybe?

And because the agents didn’t knock down your door in their enthusiasm, because the studios didn’t shower you with movie contracts, you “fell back” on teaching, didn’t you? Someone, some career counsellor somewhere, or even another teacher perhaps, advised you, “You can use your M.A degree. You just need to take a few education courses. It has great benefits and you get your summers off,” didn’t they?

And you thought about it. You thought that the salary wasn’t too bad, especially for the amount of effort you were planning to put into it. Better than being a waiter, anyway. You also realised that the teaching day, ending at 3 p.m., would give you just enough time to play at your real interests. And on a subconscious level, you knew that if you didn’t succeed at them then, you could always blame it on the fact that you, “had no time, you had to teach.”

Then the years went by, faster than you could have believed. You never got that publishing contract and Johnny Depp got all your good roles. So your disgust with Johnny, with Random House and with yourself, grew.

Eventually that disgust manifested itself into an abiding revulsion for your pupils. In particular, this little girl in front of you now, who is flushed through with agonized humiliation because, on top of everything else she thinks she should be and isn’t, she can’t read Charles Dickens and she knows you loathe her for it.

In your loathing, you’ll go one step further. You will make sure all her classmates detest her for it, too:

“I can’t believe this. Are you just going to sit there? Read it. We’re all waiting for you to say something.”

I understand you believe you should be able to express what you feel, at the very least. At least, here – in a classroom full of twelve-year-olds, you are in charge. You can say whatever you want and no one can stop you, because you have tenure, another job perk of your insufferable ‘career.’ So the worst that can happen is that you’ll get a lecture from the headmaster if any one of your pupils, or their parents has the temerity to complain. Which they hardly ever do.

Last week, it was a boy. You really outdid yourself there. You managed to make him cry. In a room full of other boys his age, he cried, because of you.

And now his life at school is effectively over. He’d already been having trouble. He’s the smallest male in his class and he can’t hit, pitch, kick or dunk a ball. However, he was managing to get through with his wry sense of humour and his ability to run pretty damn fast. Now he’ll never fit in, thanks to your public, verbal flogging.

There’s good news, though. For you, anyway. You know how you so wanted to make a social impact with your literary and/or theatrical endeavours? You have. Your words and your performances will never be forgotten. You are immortalised in the minds of your pupils.

This little girl today, for instance. She’ll will always remember and be affected by you. The first time she meets someone who calls her “friend,” she’ll be so surprised and grateful, that she’ll probably be misused. Her first job promotion, she’ll feel a clenching in her stomach, as she wonders if she’s really capable of handling it. When a man tells her he loves her, there’ll always be doubt whispering in her mind, that he can’t possible mean it. And if she becomes a mother, she’ll worry far more than most, that she’s making a mess of it.

As for that boy, if he has a supportive family, he’ll make it through the next five years of school, though they’ll be hell for him. The girls will always roll their eyes when they see him coming and sidle away. He might come to hate women because of it and himself, too. And if he doesn’t have a loving family, he might decide life is not worth it and take himself out, along with some of his classmates and teachers, probably. Possibly you.

All because you and so many others like you, couldn’t respect yourself, or your pupils or the job you were hired to do. It’s a job you’ll always despise, yet one from which no one will ever be able to pull you away. And every day you’re in it, you make my job harder for me.

Haven’t you figured out who I am?

Well, maybe you should look harder, too.

I’m the English teacher across the hall. And I hear you every day.

——————————————

credits – excerpt from Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist, photo from ‘foversouls’ on Flickr- “First Day of School”

Read and post comments | Send to a friend

Switch to our mobile site